One of the intriguing aspects of the Carolina Bays is that they frequently overlap one another. Prouty reasoned that bays impinging on other bays were the result of multiple, serial, impacts with the last in the sequence retaining the common Carolina Bay form. A problem with this method of creating Carolina Bays is that the rim height of ostensibly later formed bays is generally about the same height as the rim of those bays that were impinged upon. It is difficult to find a convincing way for multiple impacts to produce a bay within a bay with a rim height that matches the bay that contains it. The gloss over to this hard to account for property is that the bays are so shallow that virtually any rim height would be enough to bring later formed bays up to about the level of the earlier formed bays. This is a weak explanation and also points to another problem with a direct impact modelthe shallowness of the features.
If we examine how beavers go about constructing their semi-aquatic environment however, the relationship of bays to one another becomes less of a problem to explain. In pursuit of fresh trees for food and construction, beavers build canals as well as multiple dams along these water paths to function as locksthey do not like to drag logs for long distances. Also, as the family or colony expands in the number of reproducing couples, new ponds, often nearby, are produced.
Below are a few examples of how beavers alter their immediate environment. These images are from a wonderful book published in 1914, The Romance of the Beaver, by A. Radclyffe Dugmore. One can see by comparing the aerial photos and Proutys drawing of clustered Carolina Bays how direct the relationship seems between beaver pond arrangement and Carolina Bay occurrence. It is also obvious that the beaver ponds would not all have the same surface area to depth relationship and so would not flash into steam simultaneously. This would allow a sequence of bay formation as Prouty proposed in the numbered drawing below.
|The streams shown in dotted line were dammed at A and
B; as the water rose it formed two other outlets, a and
D. At these points additional dams were put. Later,
to reinforce the principal structure, supporting or
subsidiary dams, E, F, G and H, were built. On the
island, I, formed by the rising water was the first
lodge. On the west side arc the roads, J, to the
birch and maple trees. To the north-east is a
canal, E, built in order that the beavers might have
access to the groves of aspens, which was situated on
rising ground and necessitated making the canal with
three dams to hold the water at the different
levels. Toward the end of the east wing of the
canal is B straight line, L, indicating the small
aqueduct or ditch cut by the beavers in order that water
might be diverted from the streamlet to ensure an ample
supply for the canal. Other small canals, M, arc for the
purpose of making short cuts when transporting food
supplies. The upper pond, N, was made by the second
pair of beavers, who had been driven from their own home
by fire. The dam forming this pond is O, with
subsidiaries P, Q. The lodge, R, on a point of land
which has been formed into an island by cutting a
ditch. The second lodge was built by one of the
young from the first lodge.
Click for an image of a C-Bay size beaver dam in the Lake Superior area.
Home, Blowing Steam, Fire and Water, C-Bay Menu
The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.