Date sent: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 11:11:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Benny J Peiser B.J.PEISER@livjm.ac.uk
Subject: CC-DIGEST, 15/01/98
CAMBRIDGE-CONFERENCE DIGEST, 15 Juanary 1998
(1) NEAR-EARTH ASTEROID 1995 HM: A HIGHLY-ELONGATED MONOLITH
ROTATING UNDER TENSION?
(2) DETECTION OF A DUST TRAIL IN THE ORBIT OF AN
(3) POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GOES OTT: NASA SORRY ASHES WILL
NEAR-EARTH ASTEROID 1995 HM: A HIGHLY-ELONGATED MONOLITH
ROTATING UNDER TENSION?
From: Duncan Steel email@example.com
WRT: 'SEARCHING FOR THE PHYSICAL NATURE OF IMPACTING BODIES'
...another aspect of significance is whether NEAs are rubble
together by self-gravity, or monoliths. Until now no asteroid had been
observed to be spinning so fast that it could not be held together by
self-gravity, whereas our observations of 1995 HM indicate that it is very
elongated and spinning under tension, and is thus a monolith. See the
abstract etc. appended.
D.I. Steel, R.H. McNaught, G.J. Garradd, D.J. Asher and A.D. Taylor
Near-Earth asteroid 1995 HM:
A highly-elongated monolith rotating under tension?
Planetary & Space Science, 45, 1091-1098 (1997).
Abstract. We report photometry of near-Earth asteroid 1995 HM
1995 June. This object has dimensions of at most a few hundred metres. The
85 observations result in a lightcurve with an amplitude of at least two
magnitudes, indicating a highly elongated shape. The full drop in brightness
occurred within 15 minutes, and the cyclicity of the lightcurve indicates
that the rotation period of 1995 HM is only about 97 minutes, the briefest
ever determined for an asteroid. If 1995 HM is indeed spinning this quickly
then it must be a monolithic body rotating under tension, because the
density required for an object with zero tensile strength to maintain
integrity through self-gravitation at such a rotation rate is unreasonably
high (~4 gm cm-3 for a spherical profile, and above 8 gm cm-3 for the
elongation indicated by the observed lightcurve amplitude). The search for
an asteroid with such a spin rate has been a long-term quest (A.W. Harris,
Lunar Planet. Sci., XXVII, 493-494, 1996). Some difficulties in fitting a
single lightcurve over the full 15 day time-span of the observations may be
indicative of this asteroid being in a tumbling state, rather than
undergoing simple principal axis rotation.
(2) DETECTION OF A DUST TRAIL IN THE ORBIT OF AN EARTH-THREATENING
P. Jenniskens*), H. Betlem, M. deLignie, M. Langbroek: The
detection of a
dust trail in the orbit of an Earth-threatening long-period comet.
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1997, Vol.479, No.1 Pt1, pp.441-447
DUTCH METEOR SOC, NL-2318 NB LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS
IRAS has detected dust trails in the orbit of short-period
has been unable to detect such trails in the orbit of long-period
comets. We now present observations from the study of a meteor outburst that
identify the event as being due to just that. Ten orbits of meteoroids were
measured during a brief but intense outburst of the alpha Monocerotid shower
that confirm the theory that a trail of dust is brought occasionally in
collision with the Earth by planetary perturbations. Observations of this
event by multiple meteor observing techniques provide the first direct
measurement of the size distribution of dust in a comet dust trail, the dust
density in the trail of a long-period comet, and a cross section of such a
trail in the path of Earth. The implication for detecting potential
Earth-threatening long-period comets by their meteoric signature is
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GOES OTT: NASA SORRY ASHES WILL DEFILE MOON
From: The Arizona Daily Star, 13 January 1998
NASA SORRY ASHES WILL DEFILE MOON
Promises Navajos more sensitivity
By Enric Volante
NASA will consult with American Indians before it rockets any
human ashes to the moon, a spokeswoman for the space agency pledged
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration quickly
after the president of the Navajo Nation complained of insensitivity
to traditional Navajo religious beliefs. NASA's Lunar Prospector
spacecraft blasted off Tuesday and started orbiting the moon Sunday.
Inside the 650-pound craft is a 2-inch-long capsule containing an
ounce of the cremated remains of renowned planetary scientist Gene
Shoemaker of Flagstaff.
In a tribute to Shoemaker, his remains are to be the first
to rest on another celestial body.
Navajo President Albert Hale learned of the plan over the
as he emerged from the customary four days of seclusion that follows
a Blessing Way ceremony.
"I read this, and I was appalled and upset," he said
in an interview
yesterday. "The moon is revered and it regulates life cycles,
according to Navajo traditions and stories. To send something like
that over there is sacrilege."
Traditional Navajos avoid the dead to the point of not
names of deceased relatives. Some still observe the old custom of
abandoning a home in which someone has died.
"It is one thing to prove, to study, to examine and even
for men to
walk upon the moon," Hale said in a statement issued Sunday. "But it
is sacrilege, a gross insensitivity to the beliefs of many Native
Americans, to place human remains on the moon."
NASA meant no disrespect, said Peggy Wilhide, the agency's
of public affairs.
"None of the scientists on the program were aware that
this would be
insensitive," she said last night in apologizing on behalf of NASA.
"I give my commitment that if we ever discuss doing
this again, we will consult more widely and we will consult with
She would not rule out another launch of cremated remains, but
none is planned.
Hale said he appreciated the agency's apology. But he said
scientists unfamiliar with Navajo beliefs should have known better
than to scatter the dead on "something as sacred as the moon," he
He noted that President Clinton, early in his first term,
federal agencies to consult with Indian nations before taking actions
that affect tribes.
The criticism from the leader of the country's largest Indian
tribe comes as Clinton's commission on race relations is to meet in
Phoenix today and tomorrow.
University of Arizona planetary scientist Carolyn C. Porco
conceived the tribute to Shoemaker when she read his obituary and
learned he would be cremated. Shoemaker died in a July car wreck.
His widow and longtime research companion, Carolyn, watched
launch in Florida last Tuesday.
Reached at her Flagstaff home last night, she said she was
"completely astonished" to hear the space mission disturbed Navajos.
"One reason it would never have entered my mind that they
anyone else would be offended is just knowing Gene's feelings about
going into space, and particularly about going to the moon. It's
almost a religious thing with him," she said.
The Shoemakers are best known as part of the team that
Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, the vast ball of ice that crashed into
Jupiter four years ago. But Gene Shoemaker, an astronomer and
geologist, also conducted important studies decades earlier of
Northern Arizona's Meteor Crater.
"He always said that every crater was a sacred site to
Shoemaker recalled yesterday. "I think he felt that same way about
the moon because he had studied it so much and had yearned to be
there so much. It was just an important part in his life, and he
would never have thought about desecrating it."
Her husband's ashes will hit the lunar surface a year from now
the spacecraft's fuel runs out.
The ashes of the dead are not a new issue for the Navajo. Last
summer, medicine men warned tribe members to stay away from the San
Francisco Peaks north of Flagstaff after they learned the sacred
mountains had been defiled by people scattering cremated remains.
Navajo holy men arranged purification ceremonies last year to
the sanctity of the mountains.
U.S. Forest Service officials later confirmed that people
ashes in the peaks even though depositing human remains on federal
lands is illegal. They said there was no way to prevent the practice.
Those illegal acts not only offend Navajos, but force them to
for costly ceremonies, Hale said.
Explore American Indian culture at NativeWeb's Resource
Also, learn more about the Navajo Nation at its Web site.
CCCMENU CCC for 1998
The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.