Date sent: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 18:03:01 +0100 (BST)
From: Jonathan Shanklin <firstname.lastname@example.org
To: Benny J Peiser <B.J.PEISER@livjm.ac.uk
Copies to: email@example.com
Subject: Re: A SECOND 'TUNGUSKA' EVENT?
I recently did some literature searching of journals from the
researching suggestions that the event caused a display of nacreous clouds.
I don't recall seeing any suggestion of further events in the journals I
looked at. The UK Met Office should have barograms of the time in their
British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, England
Date sent: Tue, 02 Sep 1997 10:57:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: HUMBPEIS <B.J.PEISER@livjm.ac.uk
from: Duncan Steel <firstname.lastname@example.org
I saw the note about the possible later event (July 1908) that
Benny Peiser (I note that you wrote 'prior' Tunguska, whereas in fact it
would have been post-Tunguska, if it happened at all; & we know nothing much
about the date unless one makes some assumptions about the correspondence
with the publication date).
This is just to mention something obvious to you: for any
coming out of Russia, beware of the fact that at that time that country was
still on the Julian calendar (at that time, 13 days behind the Gregorian
calendar). Thus the 'October Revolution' actually occurred in early November
(Gregorian). This should be pretty obvious in that the original accounts
from Russia/Siberia of Tunguska use a date earlier than June 30.
CCCMENU CCC for 1997
The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.