PLEASE NOTE:


*

CCNet, 18 October 1999
------------------------


(1) SOME MINOR BODIES NEWS FROM THE DPS MEETING IN PADOVA
    Daniel Fischer <dfischer@astro.uni-bonn.de>

(2) POTENTIAL MEGAIMPACT-VOLCANIC CONNECTIONS
    Andrew Glikson <geospectral@spirit.com.au>

(3) CRATERS, GEOLOGICAL BOUNDARIES & ERUPTIONS
    Michael Paine <mpaine@tpgi.com.au>

(4) GREEN PLANET OR DESERT WORLD?
    Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>

(5) EVE OF DESTRUCTION
    Kasra Maasumi <kasra138@hotmail.com>

(6) GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS AFTER IMPACT DISRUPTION OF A MINOR BODY
    G. DAbramo*), A. DellOro, P. Paolicchi, UNIVERSITY OF PISA

==========
(1) SOME MINOR BODIES NEWS FROM THE DPS MEETING IN PADOVA

From Daniel Fischer <dfischer@astro.uni-bonn.de>

Dear Benny,

since there haven't been any reports here so far on the large (800
participants!) Meeting of the Division of Planetary Sciences in Padova
teh past week, except for a few press releases, let me point those
interested to the Cosmic Mirror # 152 - available at
http://www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~dfischer/mirror/152.html - where I
posted small and large stories from the conference on a daily basis. Of
specific interest for the minor bodies community are:

  - vague plans to repeat the Lunar Prospector crash on the
    Moon (that yielded absolutely zero measurable effect)
    with a larger spacecraft,

  - first insights into what NASA ponders in interplanetary
    missions more than a decade ahead (a comet nucleus
    sample return has once more high priority),

  - renewed interest in Russia in a Phobos sample return
    mission and a sample return from asteroid Fortuna (though
    it is questionable whether the commitment goes beyond the
    current study stage),

  - radar data (just a few days old) from asteroid 1999 TY2
    which may be an even faster rotator than 1999 KY26,

  - plans for groundbased observations of the two 2001
    targets of Deep Space 1, the dead comet W-H and
    the active comet Borrelly,

  - and the first prediction what will happen to comet
    Tempel 1 when the Deep Impact bullet hits it in 2005.

Other memorable aspects of the huge meeting: Many talks in the NEO
session repeated precisely that what has been said and explained on
CCNet about impact probabilities, NEODyS, keyholes and so on - this
left the impression with me that CCNet discussions actually *represent*
the current state of the field. On the technical front it was
surprising (or maybe not) in how many different areas of planetary
science the best data come from operational Adaptive Optics systems
these  days, be it the celebrated discovery of Eugenia's moon or
highly detailled images of Io, Titan or Neptune.

There was also a bizarre feud going on during the meeting between a
columnist of the Planetary Report who has misread a JPL Press Release
of July 29th (that correctly claimed that Deep Space 1 had achieved
100+ percent of its objectives which were *technological* in nature)
and had published some provocative remarks about it which he repeated
on stage now during the opening ceremonies. Plus he speculated about a
conspiracy by NASA to silence him and to hide the truth about DS1's
glitches during the Braille encounter (wrong again: the respective
Rayman Mission Log is still on the DS1 web site, at 
http://nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds1/mrlogP.html). Later during a special
session, a leading DS1 scientist rebutted the vicious attack by
presenting excerpts from his personal correspondence with said
columnist - another somewhat unusual procedure for a scientific
conference that otherwise went along in a more peaceful fashion in the
beautiful (if somewhat foggy) environment of Northern Italy.

Daniel Fischer, science writer, Germany

============
(2) POTENTIAL MEGAIMPACT-VOLCANIC CONNECTIONS

From Andrew Glikson <geospectral@spirit.com.au>

Dear Benny,

With reference to communications by T. Assmuth and M. Paine (CCNet
14.10.99) - I append the abstract of a relevant article: Oceanic
mega-impacts and crustal evolution (May 1999, Geology 27:387-341)
and references to earlier papers which discuss this question.

I will add that the likely burial of oceanic craters by volcanic
extrusions and sediment fill complicates the search for these
structures, except by detailed and expensive deep ocean seismic
reflection studies.

Andrew Glikson
15 October, 1999

----------------------

Oceanic mega-impacts and crustal evolution

(Glikson, A.Y., Geology 27:387-341)

ABSTRACT

Lunar mare crater counts, the terrestrial impact flux, and
astronomical observations of asteroids and comets define a
consistent impact rate of 4-6 * 10-15 km-2.yr-1 within the inner
solar system since the end of the Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB)
~3.8 Ga ago. Coupled with the observed crater size vs cumulative
crater size frequency relationship of N * Dc-1.8 (N = cumulative
number of craters of diameter > Dc), these rates imply formation
on Earth of more than 450 Dc * 100 km-diameter craters, more than
50 Dc * 300 km-diameter craters, and more than 20 Dc * 500
km-diameter craters. Geochemical and isotopic constraints require
that more than 80% of the projectiles impacted on time-integrated
oceanic crust since the LHB. The injection of shock energies
calculated at >108 megatons TNT-equivalent by a Dp > 10
km-diameter projectile may result in propagating fractures and
rift networks, thermal perturbations, and ensuing magmatic
activity. Examinations of the geologic record for correlated
impact and magmatic fingerprints of such events remain
inconclusive in view of isotopic age uncertainties. Potential but
unproven connections may be represented by the (1)
Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (ca. 65 Ma) impact(s), onset of the
Carlsberg Ridge spreading, Deccan volcanism, and onset of the
mantle plume of the Emperor-Hawaii chain; (2) Jurassic-Cretaceous
boundary (ca. 145 Ma) impacts, onset of Gondwana breakup,
including precursors of the east African rift structures; (3)
Permian-Triassic boundary (ca. 251 Ma) impact(s), Siberian Norilsk
traps, and early Triassic rifting; and (4) the 3.26 Ga basal Fig
Tree Group (east Transvaal) Ir-rich and Ni-rich quench
spinel-bearing impact spherules and contemporaneous
igneous-tectonic activity. Tests of the theory require further
identification and isotopic dating of distal ejecta, impact
spherule condensates, and meteoritic geochemical anomalies.

selected references

Alt, D., Sears, J. M., and Hyndman, D. W., 1988, Terrestrial
maria: the origins of large basalt plateaus, hot spots tracks and
spreading ridges: Journal of Geology, v. 96, p. 647-662;

Coffin, M. F. and Eldholm, O., 1994, Large igneous provinces:
crustal structure, dimensions and external consequences: Reviews
of Geophysics, v. 32, p. 1-36.

Gersonde, R., Kyte, F. T., Bleil, U., Diekmann, B., Flores, J. A.,
Gohl, K., Grahl, G., Hagen, R., Kuhn, G., Sierro, F. J., Volker,
D., Abelmann, A., and Bostwick, J. A., 1997, Geological record and
reconstruction of the late Pliocene impact of the Eltanin asteroid
in the Southern Ocean: Nature, v. 390, p. 357-363.

Glikson, A. Y., 1993, Asteroids and early Precambrian crustal
evolution: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 35, p. 285-319.

Glikson, A. Y., 1996, Mega-impacts and mantle melting episodes:
Tests of possible correlations: Australian Geological Survey
Organisation Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, v. 16,
part 4, p. 587-608.

Hughs, H. G., App, F. N., and McGetchin, T. N., 1977, Global
seismic effects of basin-forming impacts: Physics of the Earth and
Planetary Interiors, v. 15, p. 251-263.

Jansa, L. F., 1993, Cometary impacts into ocean: Their recognition
and the threshold constraints for biological extinction:
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 104, p.
271-286.

Jones, A. G., 1987, Are impact-generated lower crustal faults
observable?: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 85, p.
248-252.

Oberbeck, V. R., Marshall, J. R., and Aggarval, H., 1992, Impacts,
tillites and the breakdown of Gondwanaland: Journal of Geology, v.
101, p. 1-19.

Roddy, D. J., Schuster, S. H., Rosenblatt, M., Grant, L. B.,
Hassig, P. J., and Kreyenhagen, K. N., 1987, Computer simulation
of large asteroid impacts into oceanic and continental sites -
Preliminary results on atmospheric, cratering and ejecta dynamics:
International Journal of Impact Engineering, v. 5, p. 525-541.

 
Andrew Glikson
Research School of Earth Science
Institute of Advanced Studies
Australian National University
Canberra  ACT 0200 Australia
andrew.glikson@anu.edu.au <mailto:andrew.glikson@anu.edu.au>

==================
(3) CRATERS, GEOLOGICAL BOUNDARIES & ERUPTIONS

From Michael Paine <mpaine@tpgi.com.au>

Dear Benny,

Andrew Glikson sent me some extra data about impacts and eruptions.
I have prepared a graph of the information at:
http://www1.tpgi.com.au/users/tps-seti/crater.html

It shows up some interesting "co-incidences"! By the way, the version
of my Explorezone article "How an asteroid impact causes extinction"
that was published in CCNet contained an error, the number of known
Earth impact structures is "more than 150" (159 according to NRC) not
250!

Michael Paine

=================
(4) GREEN PLANET OR DESERT WORLD?

From Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>

[http://helix.nature.com/nsu/991021/991021-1.html]

Friday, October 15, 1999

Green planet or desert world?
By PHILIP BALL

For those who have wondered what life would be like on the alien
planets of the Star Wars films, a study conducted at the University of
Hamburg, Germany, should now assuage your curiosity. But Klaus
Fraedrich and colleagues at Hamburg's Meteorological Institute are not
conducting idle speculation about would-be worlds -- their work casts
light on the role that vegetation plays in the Earth's climate system.

Attempts to simulate our planet's climate using computer models are now
routine. But mostly these start out with a planet that closely
resembles the present-day Earth, for example to investigate how it
might change in the face of such disturbances as human-induced global
warming. Fraedrich and colleagues have done something more extreme.
They consider an Earth on which the land masses support the maximum
amount of vegetation conceivable -- like the Forest Moon of Endor in
The Return of the Jedi -- and one in which all the land is a barren
desert, as Luke Skywalker's homeworld of Tatooine.

Whether or not the world has ever been as green as the Hamburg group's
"Green Planet", there have certainly been times in the past when the
global climate was warmer and wetter, and the vegetation more abundant.
And before life colonized the land, this was surely a planet something
like the researchers' "Desert World". Desert conditions do not imply a
hot climate, however -- the Siberian and Mongolian steppes are partly
frigid deserts.

Fraedrich and colleagues are not, however, anticipating a return to
these extremes -- at least, not in the near future. Rather, they chose
to model them so that the effects of land plants on climate would be
seen as clearly as possible. The insights thus gathered might then be
applicable to regions where, for instance, vegetation is disappearing
due to deforestation (in Brazil) or encroachment of deserts (in
northern Africa).

Plants are not just the beneficiaries but the engineers of a moist
climate. Trees pump vast amounts of water up from their roots to their
leaves, where much of it is lost by evaporation. This process, called
transpiration, allows a typical birch tree to pump around 80 gallons of
water each day from the ground into the atmosphere. In addition, plants
help to maintain the porous structure of soil and so to retain
rainwater. And they prevent soils from being rapidly eroded away by
running water after heavy rain.

In this way, vegetation plays a crucial role in the cycling of water
from sky to ground and back again -- the so-called hydrological cycle.
And indeed Fraedrich and colleagues found that there was much more
intense cycling of water on their Green Planet relative to Desert
World; the climate was wetter. But a wetter world should mean more
cloud cover, and that in turn could increase the amount of sunlight
reflected back to space, cooling the globe.

The researchers found that this cooling effect was almost balanced out
by a warming influence resulting from the covering of bare ground by
plants. Because plants are darker than dry desert, vegetation-covered
land surface absorbs more of the Sun's heat than does the desert
surface.

Because its atmosphere was more moist, the Green Planet also had more
intense storms and monsoons than the Desert World -- cyclone systems,
for instance, are triggered initially by the condensation of water
vapour. But temperatures at the surface of the Green Planet are overall
slightly lower than those on Desert World, partly because evaporation
of water pumped up by plants sucks in heat.

Although the German study, described in the October issue of the
Journal of Climate [1], uses a highly simplified model of the
interactions between climate and vegetation, it gives a broad-brush
picture of the changes that we might expect if we continue to let the
"desert" replace the forest.

[1] Fraedrich, K., Kleidon, A., Lunkeit, F. A Green Planet versus a
Desert World: Estimating the Effect of Vegetation Extremes on the
Atmosphere. Journal of Climate 12, 3156-3163 (1999).

Macmillan Magazines Ltd 1999 - NATURE NEWS SERVICE

=================
(5) EVE OF DESTRUCTION

From Kasra Maasumi <kasra138@hotmail.com>

Hi Benny,

I was reading the CCNet and coincidentally my bio-diversity instructor
pointed out something in class that somehow I thought might be
related to the issue of "the origin of life." Well we were talking
about the structure of the eukaryotic cells, cells of all creatures
except the bacteria. These cells contain among other membrane-bound
organelles Mitochondira. Mitochondria are the power plant of the
cell. They make the energy of the cell. More interesting the mitoch.
have their own set of DNA. The cell's nucleus has one set of DNA and
the mitochondria has also its own DNA. This is nothing new;
scientists compare two very related yet diverged spieces by looking
at their Mitoch. DNA. The mitoch.DNA is also a mutation target for
all kind of mutations. What the scientists do is compare the
mitoch.DNA of, for instance, the western wolf and the eastern wolf and
look for missing DNA sequences of the western wolf in the mitoch.DNA
of the eastern wolf. So where ever one sequence is missing in one
spiece they try to find it in the other one. Now the purpose of this
is that by comparing and filling the spaces of mitoch. DNA the
scientists can build up the Mitoch.DNA of the ancester of the wolves
and also the time they lived in. Scientists, of course, did this whole
thing years ago and came to a fascinating conclusion: the ancester of
today's humans leads to only one kind of sequence of DNA. This
means that it leads to only one person. This person was named Eve,
hence the entire project was called the Eve project. So the mother of
the entire human species today is considered to be that person. This
was an African woman who lived circa 235,000 ya. Well, in evolutionary
biology there is only one way by which evolution can occur. It is
called Random Genetic Drift, more precisely the Bottleneck effect. Here
is how it works: Let's say the population of one kind of spiece is
wiped out through a natural disaster from a million to a few
individuals. Now, if these few individuals revive and the population
grows again, the gentic diversity is very small, because they rose from
only a few individuals that did not represent the entire population's
gentic diversity. Therefore, many attributes, shared by those few
individuals, will be very common among the new revived population.
Back to the Eve project, the instructor pointed out that this might
have happened 235,000 years ago. A natural disaster destroyed almost
the entire human race on earth. Only a few remained, among which Eve
survivied. She and a few males basically reproduced and after 235,000
years we have now six billion people on earth. What I wanted to know
is: What happened or might have happened at that time?

As you British say - cheers.

Kasra

EDITOR’S NOTE: It is difficult to know what kind of natural disaster/s
may have occurred at the time in question and whether or not it contributed
to the well-known reduction of genetic diversity in humans. However, an
interesting and related research report which I posted on the CCNet, 9
September 1998, provides some possible trigger for global catastrophes
that may indeed have had significant evolutionary knock-on effects. It
should be stressed, nevertheless, that major climatic downturns that
trigger Dark Ages and Ice Ages can also occur due to high-level cosmic
dust loading. BP

-------------------

Ancient 'Volcanic Winter' Tied To Rapid Genetic Divergence In Humans

University Of Illinois At Urbana-Champaign
http://www.admin.uiuc.edu/NB/98.09/Volcanic.html 

September 1998

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. -- A new hypothesis about recent human evolution
suggests  that a horrific "volcanic winter" 71,000 years ago, followed
by the coldest 1,000 years of the last Ice Age, brought widespread
famine and death to modern human populations around the world. The
abrupt "bottleneck," or decrease, in our ancestors' populations,   in
turn, brought about the rapid "differentiation" - or genetic
divergence - of the surviving populations..

The hypothesis, offered by anthropologist Stanley Ambrose of the
University of Illinois, proposes that a volcanic winter reduced
populations to "levels low enough for evolutionary changes, which
occur much faster in small populations, to produce rapid population
differentiation," Ambrose said. If, as he believes, the eruption of
Mount Toba in Sumatra caused the bottleneck, "then modern human races
may have diverged abruptly, only 70,000 years ago," Ambrose wrote in
the June issue of the Journal of Human Evolution.

Geneticists long have argued that the human species passed through a
recent bottleneck, but they never offered explanations for the
population crash or recovery, nor considered its consequences for
modern human diversification. Ambrose's model, which he calls the Weak
Garden of Eden/Volcanic Winter model, is an offshoot - with  
significant additions - of the Weak GOE model proposed by Henry
Harpending and others. The Weak GOE model proposes an African origin
for modern humans about 130,000 years ago, and credits the invention
and spread of advanced stone tool technology, 40,000 to 50,000 years
ago, for population growth after the bottleneck. Ambrose argues that
volcanic winter resulting from the super-eruption of Toba "caused the
bottleneck, and that populations may have expanded in response to
climatic warming 10,000 years before the advent of modern technology."

Ambrose has linked geneticists' research to that of volcanologists Michael
Rampino, Stephen Self, Greg Zielinski and colleagues, which shows the
super-eruption of Toba caused a volcanic winter that lasted six years
and significantly altered global climate for the next 1,000 years.
Those six years of "relentless volcanic winter" led to substantial  
lowering of global temperatures, drought and famine, and to a global
human population crash during which, if geneticists are correct, no
more than 15,000 to 40,000 people survived.

"The standard view of human evolution has been that modern populations
evolved from an ancient African ancestor. We assumed that they
differentiated gradually because we assumed ancestral populations were
large and stable," Ambrose said. But, he noted, genetic research now
demonstrates that changes in population size were sometimes  
dramatic. The new model resolves the paradox of the recent African
origin model: If we are all so recently "out of Africa," why don't we
all look like Africans?

"When our African recent ancestors passed through the prism of Toba's 
volcanic winter, a rainbow of differences appeared," Ambrose said.

=============
(6) GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS AFTER IMPACT DISRUPTION OF A MINOR BODY

G. DAbramo*), A. DellOro, P. Paolicchi: Gravitational effects after the
impact disruption of a minor planet: geometrical properties and
criteria for the reaccumulation. PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1999,
Vol.47, No.8-9, pp.975-986

*) UNIVERSITY OF PISA,DIPARTIMENTO FIS,PIAZZA TORRICELLI 2,I-56127     
   PISA,ITALY

After the catastrophic disruption of a planetary body the fragments
move according to their mutual gravitational attraction, finally
resulting into a more or less massive reaccumulation, as well as into
the formation of binary or multiple systems. In this paper we analyze
this process by means of the outcomes of the semi-empirical model of
catastrophic impacts described by Paolicchi et al. (1996) and applied
to impacts at planetary sizes by Paolicchi et al. (1993) and
Doressoundiram et al. (1997). It is possible to identify the location
in the parent body of fragments which are going to be reaccumulated or
ejected, or to form binaries. Moreover, we compare the results of
numerical integrations with three analytical predicting criteria
existing in the literature, as well as with a new one, based on the
definition of iso-velocity surfaces. We show that: (a) two of the
criteria presented and used in the literature may lead to severe over-
or underestimates of the amount of reaccumulated mass; (b) the new
criterion introduced here and the previous one described by Petit and
Farinella (1993) are capable of giving an accurate estimate in many
cases, but are less effective when the reaccumulation is limited and
not strongly concentrated onto a single big attractor; (c) the region
in the target where the analytic criteria fail is generally the
transition region between escaping and reaccumulating. This is the same
region where other interesting phenomena, such as the formation of
binaries, take place. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights
reserved.

----------------------------------------
THE CAMBRIDGE-CONFERENCE NETWORK (CCNet)
----------------------------------------
The CCNet is a scholarly electronic network. To subscribe/unsubscribe,
please contact the moderator Benny J Peiser <b.j.peiser@livjm.ac.uk>.
Information circulated on this network is for scholarly and
educational use only. The attached information may not be copied or
reproduced for any other purposes without prior permission of the
copyright holders. The fully indexed archive of the CCNet, from
February 1997 on, can be found at http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/cccmenu.html



CCCMENU CCC for 1999

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.