CCNet 123/2002 - 28 October 2002

"The earth is going to get hit, it's just a question of time. Maybe
our generation won't have to deal with it but some future generation is
definitely going to have to deal with this."
--Doug ReVelle, Los Alamos National Laboratory

"We've heard how large asteroids devastate the Earth every few
hundred thousand years or so. One wiped out the dinosaurs and
Hollywood's even made movies about one wiping out us. But Australian
scientist Ted Bryant says it's not the infrequent big space rocks we really
should be concerned about it's the smaller ones. Bryant takes Catalyst
reporter Graham Philips to the cliff tops of the coastline around
Wollongong and finds geological features that he claims were made by
Tsunami's that in turn were caused by asteroid impact. Whilst these
impacts may not be big enough to cause global damage, when one of these
splashes down into the ocean it produces a massive tsunami, which will
devastate nearby coastlines. And Bryant says further tsunamis are in
store for us. Every 120 years the Earths obit passes through the trail of
a broken up comet causing the meteorites rain down on the planet."
--ABC, 24 October 2002

    Nature Science Update, 28 October 2002

    ABC, 24 October 2002

    Andrew Yee <>

(4) WAITING FOR THE LEONIDS, 27 October 2002

    Die Welt, 26 October 2002

    BBC News Online, 23 October 2002

    Roberto Gorelli <>

    Michael Paine <>

    Hermann Burchard <>

     Reuters, October 22, 2002 09:34 AM ET 


>From Nature Science Update, 28 October 2002

Wave devastated Seattle area: Ancient tsunami provides clues to future

28 October 2002
Around 1,100 years ago, a tsunami devastated the northwestern coast of North
America where the city of Seattle now stands, computer modelling has
revealed. The research could help planners reduce damage and loss of life in
the event of a future giant wave1.

About 900AD, a shallow but powerful earthquake shook Seattle's harbour, the
Puget Sound, a 2,329 square-kilometre inlet of the Pacific Ocean. The quake,
produced by the still-active Seattle fault, would have sent a tsunami
throughout the sound, the study shows.

Combining clues from silty deposits around the sound2 with modern computing
power, Shunichi Koshimura, of the Disaster Reduction and Human Renovation
Institution in Kobe, Japan and colleagues have recreated the tsunami's
spread. "It's a complex detective story," says one of team, Harold Mofjeld
of the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle, Washington.

They calculate that the tsunami reached heights of 3 to 7 metres. It
travelled at 30 to 45 kilometres per hour, and swept at least 300 metres
onto shore in some places. Two areas bore the brunt of the wave: Cultus Bay
and West Point.

Excavation at West Point has revealed a Native American fire pit beneath
sand swept onshore by the wave. "Many people were probably living by the
water's edge," says Mofjeld. According to the model the wave took only three
minutes to get from the middle of the Sound to West Point. "It happened so
fast," says Mofjeld, escape was very unlikely.

Hazard warning

Monitoring of the Seattle fault indicates a similar tsunami could hit the
Puget Sound again - though it's almost impossible to predict when. Today
over 3 million people live and work in the Seattle area. Damage would be
"substantial", says Mofjeld, especially because the wave would arrive just
minutes after a powerful earthquake.

A wave the size of the one modelled by Koshimura can lift cars. Combine that
with gas lines severed after a quake, "and you've got the makings of a
disaster," agrees tsunami researcher Emile Okal, at Northwestern University
in Evanston, Illinois.

The latest model will be incorporated into hazard maps, which predict where
tsunami risk is the greatest in terms of how far waves can travel inland, or
where they will be most powerful. These maps, an idea borrowed from Japanese
planners, form part of the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program that
covers the US West Coast, Alaska and Hawaii.

Being a young city in a geologically active region, most of Seattle's newer
buildings are designed to withstand earthquakes and would fare better
against a tsunami too. It is no stranger to small tsunamis, caused by
landslides into water after earthquakes.

Signposts and public-awareness programs advise residents on exposed shores
to head for high ground as quickly as possible following a 'quake. "The
earthquake serves as Seattle's tsunami warning," says geologist Brian
Atwater of the US Geological Survey at the University of Washington in
Koshimura, S., Mofjeld, H. O., González, F. I. & Moore, A. L. Modelling the
1100bp paleotsunami in Puget Sound, Washington. Geophysical Research
Letters, published online, doi:10.1029/2002GL015170 (2002). |Homepage|

Atwater, B. F. & Moore, A. L. A tsunami about 1000 years ago in Puget Sound,
Washington. Science, 258, 1614 - 1617, (1992). |Homepage|
© Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2002


>From ABC, 24 October 2002

We've heard how large asteroids devastate the Earth every few hundred
thousand years or so. One wiped out the dinosaurs and Hollywood's even made
movies about one wiping out us.

But Australian scientist Ted Bryant says it's not the infrequent big space
rocks we really should be concerned about it's the smaller ones. Bryant
takes Catalyst reporter Graham Philips to the cliff tops of the coastline
around Wollongong and finds geological features that he claims were made by
Tsunami's that in turn were caused by asteroid impact.

Whilst these impacts may not be big enough to cause global damage, when one
of these splashes down into the ocean it produces a massive tsunami, which
will devastate nearby coastlines.

And Bryant says further tsunamis are in store for us. Every 120 years the
Earths obit passes through the trail of a broken up comet causing the
meteorites rain down on the planet.

Full Program Transcript:

Narration: A comet breaks up. It creates a cloud of rock, dust and ice in
the solar system. The Earth now periodically orbits through it...and every
few hundred years pieces of it crash down, splash into the ocean and cause
giant waves...deadly tsunamis. That's the theory of this Australian
geologist Ted Bryant. And his evidence is that tsunamis have hit this
coastline every few centuries, he says. One washed over the Wollongong area
in 1500 AD. It wasn't big enough to destroy civilisation like in the movies,
but the film Deep Impact does give a feel for what happened 500 years ago

Graham Phillips: So if we were standing here in 1500 AD looking out to sea
what would we have seen?

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: You would see the horizon starting to lift
up. And within about a minute you'd see it moving towards you. And at this
headland you'd probably see a wall of water 20 metres high or more.

Narration: Hollywood got the idea of an asteroid creating a tsunami right,
but they did make a classic blunder, says Ted. The tsunami wouldn't have
actually broken onto the shore.

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: I can remember the scene of the wave coming
into Cape Padders and breaking at the height of the Statue of Liberty. It
doesn't do that. It swamps .... It doesn't come in as breaking wave.

Narration: And that fact that it doesn't break gives the tsunami its power -
enough power to heave those boulders behind us out of the water and up on to
the ledge, says Ted...evidence for the 1500 tsunami.

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: It's very difficult for storm waves to move
boulders this size because storm waves break off shore. And another thing
these boulders are aligned. They're aligned like dominos and they all point
back in that south-east direction.

Graham: That's the direction the wave came from

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: That's the direction they come from.

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: And finally, when we walk along cliff tops,
down at Jervis Bay especially, we find these boulders up on the cliff tops,
lined up to the south-east.

Narration: And these potholes are further evidence says Ted. From the shape,
they must have been carved into the rocks in just minutes, he says, by the
churning waters of the tsunami.

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: We know that if the water moves fast enough
it has air bubbles in it and they're very unstable and they instantly
collapse at 30,000 atmospheres pressure and when they collapse they can just
chew through solid bedrock. But the flows moving so you get these snakelike
features that have been carved into the bedrock as well.

Narration: And the tremendous force of the flow even carved a new bay in the

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: It's gone in a counter-clockwise direction
and gouged out this circular embayment here.

Graham Phillips: So you're telling me the vortex could carve through all
that depth of rock there.

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: We believe we're looking at 20 metres depth
of erosion - instantaneous - and that was carved out in less than a minute.

Narration: Ted's certain all this happened in 1500 because he's carbon-dated
the tiny pieces of shell washed up by the big waves. But the next step his
proof needs is evidence that 300-metre-wide chunks of that comet do fall
down every few hundred years. And that comes from an unusual source...this
network of listening devices across America...used by scientists at Los
Alamos military laboratories to pick up nuclear bomb detonations. But they
also hear the explosions of incoming meteors.

Dr Doug ReVelle: We pick up objects that penetrate deeply into the
atmosphere and are able to generate a shock wave by virtue of their very
high velocity and that shock wave then decays and travels to earth where we
pick it up as a signal."

Narration: And judging from Doug Revelle's signals, meteors the size Ted
needs arrive once every 120 years or so. That's spot on. Other scientists at
Los Alamos are showing how the falling fragments create the tsunamis, by
mathematically modelling them on one of the world's most powerful

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: They don't drop in like dropping a pebble
directly into the ocean and then a big splash and a lot spray and that spray
is 5000 degrees Celsius. So it would incinerate us.

Narration: And surprisingly, it's not that initial big splash that creates
the tsunami. Rather, the impact shoots a jet of water kilometres into the
air and as that jet falls down it gives birth to the deadly tsunami. And the
Los Alamos researchers have even thought up new disaster scenarios from that
broken up comet. Even if the fragments don't land in the ocean. Take that
famous impact above Siberia in 1908. Flattening 2000 square kilometres of
forest and even producing a rising mushroom cloud, it looked like a nuclear
blast. If something like that happened these days - an event as Doug calmly
calls it - it could be mistaken for a nuclear attack and trigger a

Dr Doug ReVelle: Yes, there was a very interesting event that is not totally
public knowledge yet. This event fell out over the Mediterranean just to the
west of Crete is where it ended and had that event fallen over Israel or
Syria or Jordan or that part of the world just a little bit further east
there might have been some very, very tense moments.

Narration: An event needn't even make it to the ground to be dangerous.

Dr Doug ReVelle: Certainly every year we get dozens of objects that
penetrate down to the 20 kilometre height range which are just above where
aeroplanes fly and if there happens to be low turbulence in the atmosphere
and this dust just kind of hangs there for a while and an aeroplane were to
draw that into their jet engine there would be big trouble.

Narration: The final sting is, these relatively small pieces of comet rubble
are too tiny for astronomers to track.

Associate Professor Ted Bryant: We're picking up the small objects after
they pass the earth. So we'd get absolutely no warning of this.

Dr Doug ReVelle: The earth is going to get hit, it's just a question of time
maybe our generation won't have to deal with it but some future generation
is definitely going to have to deal with this."

Copyright 2002, ABC


>From Andrew Yee <>

University Communications
University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont

Author: Lynda J Majarian
Phone: (802)656-2005 Fax: 656-3203

Release Date: 10-23-2002

Forces of Nature: UVM Geologists' Storm and Flood Research Featured in
Premier Science Journal

Is New England headed for troubled waters? Significant storms and floods may
be ready to wreak havoc, according to geologists at the University of
Vermont. Their study of storm and flood patterns in the Northeast over the
past 13,000 years will appear in the Oct. 24 issue of the journal Nature,
the world's premier information resource for biological and physical

Funded by a National Science Foundation Career grant, Paul Bierman,
professor of geology, led a team of colleagues and students in a four-year
project to collect and study core samples from 21 lakes in Vermont and the
Adirondacks. Among their conclusions: periods of intense storminess have
peaked in the North Atlantic region roughly every 3,000 years over a
13,000-year period.

"The last big group of storms was -- you guessed it -- almost 3,000 years
ago," says Bierman, who co-authored the Nature paper with Anders Noren,
former graduate student of geology at UVM; Andrea Lini, assistant professor
of geology; and colleagues in Washington and California. While they cannot
predict exactly when the next big storm will hit, the regional patterns they
were able to establish are red flags to emergency planners, who rely on
early detection to quickly evacuate people to higher ground when waters

There was no time for warnings, preparations or escape when record rainfall
overflowed rivers and partially submerged several Vermont towns in 1927,
killing 55 people and destroying $30 million in property. But that disaster,
says Bierman, was merely a drop in the bucket compared to earlier -- and
future -- hydrologic hassles.

"If this cycle continues, the frequency and severity of intense rainstorms
that can cause massive flooding should continue to increase for the next
several hundred years," agrees Noren, who is lead author of the Nature
article. He joined Bierman's research team as a graduate student and wrote
his thesis on the project, building on the thesis of another geology
graduate student, Sarah Brown. In a laborious process he calls "a wintry
dance," Noren spent long, cold days helping to collect sedimentary archives
by hammering 20-foot pieces of 3-inch diameter PVC pipe into the bottom of
frozen lakes and extracting core samples that were later sliced,
photographed and painstakingly analyzed.

"In each of the cores we looked for sandy layers of sediment that were
washed into the lakes during rainstorm-induced floods," he explains. During
"nor'easters," cyclones and hurricanes, material stored in upland streams
and basin hill slopes is eroded and transported to lake basins. "By getting
radiocarbon dates on the organic materials in and around these layers, we
were able to determine when floods occurred," Noren notes. The study's main
conclusions were culled from an analysis of the flood chronologies of all
the lakes.

"There may be much bigger floods than the 1927 disaster lurking out there,"
Bierman says. "But the most important thing to come out of this research is
that, for the first time, we know the history of stormy periods in New
England over the past 13,000 years." The storm rhythms observed in the UVM
study are consistent with those recorded in the Greenland ice sheet, which
carries signals in its chemical and physical properties that reflect an
upswing in storminess over the past 600 years. It is suspected that the
impact of human activity, especially the emission of atmospheric greenhouse
gases, could speed up storm cycles.

Bierman has conducted additional research on alluvial fans, which collect
debris from hill slopes and landslides. Those results support the data
collected on regional storms, and will appear in the next issue of the
Geological Society of America bulletin.

Noren graduated from UVM in May with a master's degree in geology. He has
returned to his native Minnesota and currently is a research technician at
the Limnological Research Center at University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.

Read the Nature article, titled "Millennial-scale storminess variability in
the northeastern United States during the Holocene epoch," online at

>From, 27 October 2002

Professional meteor watchers predict and prepare for this year's Leonid

by Pamela L. Gay

On November 19, early risers in North America will (weather permitting)
start their day with a spectacular sky show. That morning, Earth will pass
through debris trails left by Comet Temple-Tuttle. As flecks of cometary
dust and debris streak through Earth's atmosphere they will burn up or
explode, collectively creating a meteor shower called the Leonids. This
natural fireworks display is certain to draw the attention of millions of
people around the world. Scattered among starry-eyed kids and captivated
adults will be astronomers who view the Leonids as a grand laboratory
experiment for testing their understanding of comets, meteor shower
intensities, and our atmosphere.

Scientists like Rob Suggs, leader of the Space Environments Team, will be
out counting. He'll be in New Mexico with his colleagues recording meteors
with video cameras as part of a larger effort to protect satellites from
meteor showers.

Some groups of scientists have studied Comet Temple-Tuttle's and Earth's
orbits to predict when we should pass directly through the comet's debris
trails. When this happens, we experience meteor storms with tens of meteors
streaking through the sky each second. By keeping counts of how many meteors
appear per minute, scientists can determine when we actually passed through
the debris trails and confirm or refine their predictions.

The three leading prediction teams forecast an initial peak at approximately
4:00 Universal Time (UT) on November 19 (11 pm EST November 18) when we pass
through a debris trail left in 1767. This peak will be most striking for
observers in Europe. American viewers will lose much of this display to
moonlight, and the meteors they do see will appear low on the eastern
horizon. The second peak will be at 10:30 UT (5:30 am EST) November 19 while
traveling through debris deposited in 1866. This shower is ideally timed for
North American observers. The radiant will be high in the southeast and the
moon will be sinking in the west.
Not all Leonid counters will be confined to Earth, though. "The ISS will be
flying over Europe during the first outburst," explains Suggs. "Then it will
pass over North America during the second outburst. Perfect timing!"
Astronauts looking out the space station's windows could spot more meteors
than anyone else.

Another set of flying observers will be tracking the meteor shower over
Spain. Peter Jenniskens will be leading a NASA team in a mobile science
mission called the Multi-Instrument Aircraft Campaign (MAC). Flying in two
NASA aircraft, MAC scientists will observe the storm from above the clouds.
Keeping their planes 100 kilometers (62 miles) apart, they will monitor the
storm from two angles and obtain a three-dimensional perspective on how
meteors pass through our atmosphere. Using an arsenal of spectrometers,
cameras, and counters (for meteor flux measurements), they will study how
meteors burn up, and what (if any) of the meteors' organic material
survives. "Meteors dominated the supply of organics to the early Earth if
organic matter survived this pathway efficiently," Jenniskens notes.
"Understanding these processes relies heavily on empirical evidence that is
still very limited."

If you would like to contribute to this year's meteor shower studies, find a
dark location and prepare to record your counts. Amateurs are encouraged to
keep logs of how many meteors they see per minute (or every 5 or 15 minutes)
during the night. You can help the MAC team by reporting your counts. You
can also report observations to organizations such as the International
Meteor Organization, North American Meteor Network, and the American Meteor
Society. Or you could share your reports with others in's
Discussion Forums or send your meteor photos to

To find out when the Leonids should peak in your area and later compare your
observations with the predictions, visit this NASA website or the MAC
mission's flux estimator page.

For more information about the Leonids and how to observe them, see the
November issue of Astronomy magazine.

Copyright © 1996-2002 Kalmbach Publishing Co. 


>From Die Welt, 26 October 2002

... da kommen sie her, die Asteroiden. Damit sie dort auch bleiben und uns
nicht vernichten, dachte neulich ein Weltkongress über Methoden nach, sie
unschädlich zu machen

Von Ulli Kulke

Wir sind umzingelt. Allan Harris kann es auf seinem Monitor zeigen. In der
Mitte, auf schwarzem Grund, lässt der Astrophysiker am Zentrum für Luft- und
Raumfahrt (DLR) in Berlin-Adlershof die Erde und die anderen inneren
Planeten zirkulieren, in ruhiger Bahn. Doch etwas weiter draußen, zwischen
Mars und Jupiter, da lauern sie vieltausendfach, umkreisen das Zentrum
unseres Planetensystems wie ein Schwarm Haie seine Beute: grüne Punkte, so
dicht, dass sie zu einer homogenen Masse verschmelzen: die Asteroiden.

So lange die gefährlichen Brocken aus Stein oder Erz mit gut 30.000 Sachen
in ihrem Hauptgürtel durchs Universum jagen, sind sie für uns uninteressant.
Doch auf Harris' Monitor tummeln sich auch Punkte im Innern unseres
Planetensystems, mal hier, mal da kreuzen sie die Bahn von Mars, Venus,
Merkur - und der Erde. Was tun, wenn so ein Klumpen, wenige Meter oder
mehrere Kilometer groß, auf unseren Planeten zu stürzen droht? Die Frage
stellten sich kürzlich 70 Wissenschaftler aus aller Welt in Arlington
(Virgina) auf einem Workshop über gezielte Abwehrmaßnahmen.



>From BBC News Online, 23 October 2002

By Dr David Whitehouse, BBC News Online science editor

The strange shapes seen in a rock from Mars that some researchers say are
fossilised bacteria really are tiny microorganisms, say American

But while they are confident the Mars rock contains fossilised life they
cannot quite bring themselves to say it comes from the Red Planet, it might
be Earthly contamination.

Despite the uncertainty about their origin establishing that the small
structures really were living things, and not just mineral globules, would
be an advance in a field that has
sharply divided opinions.

Lawrence Taylor of the University of Tennessee told BBC News Online that
so-called "nannobacteria" found on Earth resemble those found in the Mars
rock." The next task is to find a way to determine if they really came from

Life on Mars?

Since the dramatic announcement in 1996 by Nasa scientists that there were
several lines of evidence that suggested rock ALH84001, picked up from
Antarctic ice but originally from Mars, contained evidence of life,
scientific opinion has been divided between those who wanted to be
persuaded, and those who did not.

Since then the rock has been extensively analysed and many papers written,
but few have shifted their viewpoints.

One camp has looked at magnetic grains in the microfossils saying that they
appear identical to magnetic grains found in some terrestrial bacteria.
Another group of researchers looked at indications of how carbon deposits in
the rock were formed looking to see if they were deposited at low enough
temperatures so they could be by-products of life.

Rival researchers have argued that the very small size of the purported
microorganisms make it unlikely that they were living things because they
are too small.

In the past few years however some researchers, principally Robert Folk of
the University of Texas, have put forward evidence that terrestrial
nannobacteria do exist and add significantly to the Earth's biomass.

The latest study, by Robert Folk and Lawrence Taylor, casts doubt on the
lower size limit for life viewpoint. Some of the larger bacteria found in
ALH2004 are actually close in size to the smallest terrestrial organisms.

But if the case for the fossilised microorganisms in ALH84001 is
strengthened somewhat the big question remains: where did they come from?

"We conclude that the nanobodies that are so abundant in ALH84001 are indeed
nannobacteria. However whether these bodies originated on Mars, or are
Antarctic contamination remains a valid question," say the researchers.

Copyright 2002, BBC



>From Roberto Gorelli <>

Dear Benny,

I read in CCNet 118/2002 (9 October 2002), the DPS Press Release of Alan W.
Harris on the impact frequency of "Tunguska-sized" events. I would like to
express some considerations on his arguments.  

When I developed my catalogue of megatonic events I inserted also the
Tunguska event, but in effects the class of megatonic events for definition
would have to comprise only events from
0,5 to 5,0 megatons. The Tunguska event with its credited value of 12.5 +/-
2.5 megatons is in the decamegatonic class: from this work I obtained the
frequency of an event every 10 years
on all the Earth and one every 30 -35 years on mainland for the of megatonic
class events.

The events of the order of 1-10 kilotons happen with a frequency of
approximately 10 to the year: calculations of Shoemaker, from those most
recent ones of Harris (of which I have only read extracted) and others
indicate for the events with analogous power to that one of the Tunguska
values of the order of an event every 350 years or more. 

The events, between 0.1 and 10 megatons can truly happen in the next tens of
years and during our life, (on February, 1st 1994, the US President was
woken up during the night as sensors had detected a high energy signal above
the Pacific, following a method of calculation of the energy emitted in the
infrared the event could to have approached a 1 megaton of power).

It is necessary to reflect on a point: the kilotonic events in a generalized
manner do not produce damages and in any case only locally. While the
Tunguska events are of concern, they must  be considered as "unprobable
event" with the meter of the duration of the human life, the ettokilotonic
and megatonic events are instead in my opinion those of which we must mainly
preoccupy in how much even if the damages that they produced are not
comparable with events as Tunguska their force are not get exhaustedded in
the atmosphere like for the kilotonic events, moreover if they had to happen
in determined areas of the planet could provoke an equal
number of victims to those expectable by Tunguska events. Do we want to be
worried of this class of events or should be better ignore them? 

Roberto Gorelli


>From Michael Paine <>

Dear Benny

There may be some lessons here for the NEO community

Michael Paine

International SETI Launches New Detection Scale

Little Ferry - Oct 23, 2002

A new scale designed to give the public an expert view of any claimed
detection of extraterrestrial intelligence has been launched today by the
International Academy of Astronautics' Search for Extraterrestrial
Intelligence Permanent Study Group at the World Space Congress in Houston.

The Rio Scale was initiated by Drs. Ivan Almar of Hungary and Jill Tarter of
the SETI Institute in California to give the media and the public an idea of
the credibility and importance -- as determined by a panel of SETI
scientists -- of any claim that intelligence elsewhere in the universe has
been detected.

To demonstrate the Rio Scale, Dr. Seth Shostak of the SETI Institute and
Almar have authored a paper for the World Space Congress assessing fictional
and past non-fictional SETI events.

>From the realm of fiction they include the films Contact, The Arrival,
Independence Day, The Sphere and 2001: A Space Odyssey and books including
The Listeners, The Sparrow and The Coming. The non-fiction claims include
the "face on Mars" and a SETI hoax involving the star EQ Peg.

So what Rio Scale rating would they get? The scale runs from zero (for
non-credible claims of detection) to ten (for a completely reliable
detection.) The SETI type detection in the movie Contact gets high marks
near 10 because of the confirmations by telescopes around the world.

On the other hand a claim of a real detection in the EQ Peg hoax reaches
only 3-4 on the scale during the claim, dropping to zero when a large radio
telescope proves the signal is false.

"Hollywood has been rather inventive about scenarios involving contact with
extraterrestrial societies, and their stories are well known," says Shostak.

"Some of these films make good 'lab rats' for testing out the Rio Scale, and
testing is definitely desirable. After all, if SETI researchers picks up a
signal, it will be very useful to have a scheme in place for assessing the
importance and reliability of the discovery."

Copyright 2002, Space Daily


>From Hermann Burchard <>

Dear Benny,

from SCIENCES & AVENIR online, octobre 2002 - N° 668, Inventaire des
astéroïdes qui menacent la Terre, a tabulation of potential impactors this
century, "de 27 astéroïdes géocroiseurs connus", min dist in AU:

(4179) Toutatis 29 septembre 2004 0,01036
2000 UG11 9 novembre 2008 0,009096
1999 AQ10 18 février 2009 0,01183
1999 MN 2 juin 2010 0,007625
1998 HH49 17 octobre 2023 0,007852
1999 AN10 7 août 2027 0,002652
2001 WN5 25 juin 2028 0,004367
(35396) 1997 XF11 26 octobre 2028 0,006228
2000 QK130 15 mars 2036 0,01157
2002 NY40 11 février 2038 0,007548
2001 WN5 26 juin 2039 0,001485
2001 AD2 3 avril 2046 0,01125
1999 DB7 28 février 2048 0,007903
1988 TA 1er octobre 2053 0,01030
2002 CY9 25 janvier 2055 0,01019
(4660) Nereus 14 février 2060 0,008011
1999 RQ36 22 septembre 2060 0,005548
2001 QQ142 13 décembre 2062 0,01107
(2340) Hathor 21 octobre 2069 0,006598
2002 LV 3 août 2076 0,007149
1999 JU3 6 décembre 2076 0,01047
2002 CU11 31 août 2080 0,004270
(2340) Hathor 21 octobre 2086 0,005973
1999 VP11 22 octobre 2086 0,006027
2000 WO107 30 novembre 2093 0,007877
1998 SC15 8 avril 2095 0,01064
(35396) 1997 XF11 27 octobre 2095 0,01146

See also
 Astéroïdes De plus en plus près


>From Reuters, October 22, 2002 09:34 AM ET
By Orathai Sriring

NONG KHAI, Thailand (Reuters) - Almost half a million people flocked to
witness the annual rising of fireballs from the Mekong where the river
snakes between Thailand and Laos, but the phenomenon turned out to be a damp

A four-hour downpour from twilight on Monday put the dampers on the show for
most of the crowd camped out along a 10-km (six-mile) stretch of river bank
opposite the Laotian capital of Vientiane.

Usually thousands of reddish-pink balls of light are said to shoot up into
the sky above the Mekong, which runs through five nations before flowing out
to sea in Vietnam.

But this year only a few dozen balls were seen.

The fireballs, called "bung fai phaya naga," or "naga fireballs," after a
mythical giant serpent, have never been proved scientifically, but some
speculate they are the result of natural gases rising from the river bottom.

Others say they are a hoax, while local myth tells of an ancient waterworld
beneath the brown waters of the Mekong. Locals say the phenomenon has been
occurring for half a century.

They happen during the full moon of the eleventh lunar month in Nong Khai
province, 600 km (360 miles) northeast of Bangkok.

"This is terrible," complained a disgruntled grandmother, who spent hours on
traffic-clogged roads to see the event.

"The fireballs weren't that spectacular and my grandchildren were crying and

The fireballs this year drew more than four times the usual crowd because a
recent movie on the same subject.

"Usually we get around 100,000 visitors, but the crowd this year is
estimated at 450,000-500,000 because of the movie," said Saroch Laowilai, a
spokesman for the Nong Khai provincial administration.

All 30 hotels and inns in the town of Nong Khai were fully booked and
several hospitals and Buddhist temples offered room and board, officials

Thousands also camped along highways and the river bank.

But despite the disappointment from out-of-towners, locals enjoyed the show.

"I don't how they happen," said Poon Matawong, a 72-year-old fisherman who
says he first saw the fireballs when he was 20.

"But I believe that the waterworld exists."
Copyright 2002, Reuters

CCNet is a scholarly electronic network. To subscribe/unsubscribe, please
contact the moderator Benny J Peiser < >. Information
circulated on this network is for scholarly and educational use only. The
attached information may not be copied or reproduced for any other purposes
without prior permission of the copyright holders. The fully indexed archive
of the CCNet, from February 1997 on, can be found at DISCLAIMER: The opinions,
beliefs and viewpoints expressed in the articles and texts and in other
CCNet contributions do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and
viewpoints of the moderator of this network.

CCCMENU CCC for 2002

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.