CCNet DEBATE, 20 November 1998
ASTROBIOLOGY & PANSPERMIA
From Andrew Y. Glikson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Dear Benny Peiser,
I have followed Chandra Wickramashinghe and Fred Hoyle's
Panspermia ideas for some time with fascination and, I must admit,
a degree of incredulity, for the following reasons:
1. Given the presence of organic molecules in meteoritic and
interstellar dust, it is well known that the distinction between
organic matter and bacterial life forms is not a quantitative one
but a qualitative quantum jump. As I am not aware of a discovery
of bacteria in extraterrestrial particles to date, I fail to see
the evidence for the Panspermia assertion.
2. How is Panspermia reconciled with the physical limits on the
survival of DNA, which I believe breaks down at temperatures lower
than those to which interstellar particles are exposed during, for
example, cometary sun-grazing or atmospheric entry?
3. In my readings of early terrestrial evolution and the role of
meteoritic impacts I have not yet come across a rationale as to
why Earth, given the presence of water and favorable surface
temperatures, is any less suited as a cradle for bacterial life
than any other planet or interstellar space?
4. Finally, would proponents of Panspermia care to comment on the
ideological parallels between Panspermia and UFO-type cults -
which seem to share peculiar philosophical tenets, namely (1)
importation of life/culture from outer space; (2) an
underestimation of the potential of Earth itself as a cradle of
life, evolution and culture, and (3) a lack of elementary
scientific evidence - ie. either for interstellar bacteria or for
(Dr) Andrew Glikson
20 November, 1998
CCCMENU CCC for 1998
The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.