PLEASE NOTE:


*

CCNet 140/2002 - 2 December 2002
--------------------------------

"With a new environmental hazard seeming to appear almost each day,
it's almost comforting to know that at least one threat to the Earth has
been downgraded. Still, it's a game of numbers. These objects, also known
as minor planets, number in the hundreds of thousands. Asteroids have given
in the past, just as they could take away in the future. But if Nature is
to be believed, for now these identified flying objects can recede from the
worry list."
--Los Angeles Times, 30 November 2002


"The human race, to which so many of my readers belong, has been
playing at children's games from the beginning, and will probably do it
till the end, which is a nuisance for the few people who grow up. And
one of the games to which it is most attached is called, ''Keep
tomorrow dark,'' and which is also named (by the rustics in Shropshire, I
have no doubt) ''Cheat the Prophet.'' The players listen very carefully and
respectfully to all that the clever men have to say about what is to
happen in the next generation. The players then wait until all the
clever men are dead, and bury them nicely. Then they go and do something
else. That is all. For a race of simple tastes, however, it is great fun.

--Gilbert Keith Chesterton


(1) TINY ASTEROIDS SHARE EARTH'S ORBIT
    The Ottawa Citizen, 1 December 2002

(2) APOCALYPSE NOT JUST NOW
    Los Angeles Times, 30 November 2002

(3) LIFE SAVE FROM SUPERNOVAS?
    Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>

(4) SCIENTISTS USE VIDEO IN SEARCH FOR RAE METEORITE
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory <info@jpl.nasa.gov>

(5) WESTERN FIREBALL WAS SPACE JUNK, NOT METEOR
    Associated Press, 29 November 2002

(6) JUPITER-LIKE PLANETS FORMED IN HUNDREDS - NOT MILLIONS - OY YEARS
    Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>

(7) NEW PLANETS CAN FORM IN UNDER 1000 YEARS
    UPI, 28 November 2002

(8) THE FIRST DECADAL REVIEW OF THE EDGEWORTH-KUIPER BELT: TOWARDS NEW
FRONTIERS
    Joel Parker <joel@boulder.swri.edu>

(9) ORBITAL CALCULATIONS
    Alan Fitzsimmons <a.fitzsimmons@qub.ac.uk>

(10) MARTIAN METEORITE PATROL PICKS ONE UP
     John Michael Williams <jwill@AstraGate.net>

==============
(1) TINY ASTEROIDS SHARE EARTH'S ORBIT

>From The Ottawa Citizen, 1 December 2002
http://www.canada.com/national/story.asp?id={F440DD22-306D-47A0-BA15-35D1CD109AA5}

Tiny asteroids share Earth's orbit
Canadian discovers space rocks unique in solar system
 
Tom Spears 

Meet the neighbours you never knew about.

Earth has two heavenly bodies sharing our orbit in addition to our moon -- a
pair of recent discoveries made by a Canadian, yet almost unknown in this
country outside a tiny group of astronomers.

Not quite a second and third moon, not quite like anything else in the solar
system, these two chunks of space rock follow a path much like ours around
the sun, their orbits taking almost exactly one year each, like ours.

But their strange orbital paths are more complex than ours, tugged into a
looping shape a little like a telephone cord by the interplay of Earth's
gravity, the sun's gravity and their own speed.

And every few hundred years they swing past Earth -- so close that our
gravity actually pulls them in and slingshots them away again, but without
ever hitting us.

The two not-quite-moons are asteroids. One is called Cruithne (pronounced
Croo-een-ya), a name from ancient Scottish legend; the other has no name.
Both have numbers: Cruithne is 3753 and the other is 2002AA29.

Most asteroids just go around and around the sun, mostly in a "belt"
orbiting out past Mars. These two somehow leaked out of the asteroid belt,
as a few asteroids do from time to time.

Maybe a collision pushed them out. Maybe they were caught in a combination
of gravitational pulls from different directions.

However they left their old home, they ended up in our neighbourhood. Each
stays an average of about 149 million kilometres from the sun, like Earth, a
distance astronomers call one astronomical unit. (Orbits are never quite
circles; they're always an ellipse, sort of a stretched circle, so the
actual distance from the centre varies slightly.)

But what are these two companions of ours? Astronomers are having a hard
time coming to grips with what to call them. For now, a lot of discussion of
what they are centres mostly on what they're not.

They're not like our moon, which goes around and around Earth. The two
asteroids' orbits are centred by the sun.

"We should really invent some kind of new word," says Queen's University
astronomer Paul Wiegert, who found it. "Usually we call it either a
companion asteroid or a co-orbital asteroid," but he feels neither of those
terms really carries the right meaning.

It was in the 1990s that Mr. Wiegert, then at York University, noticed the
path of Cruithne's orbit was a bit unusual.

"The unusualness is fairly subtle," he says now. "That's why it hadn't been
noticed." Nonetheless it was noticeable, and he started crunching numbers.

In 1997 he was ready to announce his discovery. He and his Finnish partners
published it in Nature, a major British science journal where scientists
announce new discoveries.

Mainstream media didn't pick it up. The public mostly didn't hear of the new
Canadian discovery, perhaps because the relationship of Earth and its two
little neighbours is so complex that Mr. Wiegert has to send interviewers to
look at models before he can discuss it with them.

The relationship between Earth and little Cruithne is like two cars going
the same direction around a traffic circle at the same average speed. But
one car first speeds up and passes the second car, then slows down and
allows itself to be passed. Then it speeds up and passes again and slows
down, over and over.

Anyone watching from the side of the road just sees two cars going the same
direction.

But someone in one car sees the other car moving ahead of it and then behind
it, and then in front again.

That's what Cruithne does with us. For 385 years it travels very slightly
faster than Earth, coming a little closer to us all the time while orbiting
the sun. Finally it approaches us. But it doesn't hit us; as our gravity
pulls at it, Cruithne's speed makes it swing around us and slow down,
falling behind us again.

Even as Earth pulls in the asteroid, it speeds up and its speed allows it to
escape from the Earth's pull. In this way Earth is protected from impact,
despite the similarity of the asteroid's orbit to Earth's, Mr. Wiegert says.

"It's in the same sense as the planets orbit the sun. The sun attracts the
planets, but the planets aren't sucked in. There's a balance between the
sun's gravity and the speed" of the planets.

"Essentially there's a barrier -- just the velocity of the particle in
balance with gravity that just pushes the particle away," he says. "The
particle needs more energy than it has to get over this, so it just goes
back the other way.

"It's going to stay like that. It's a consistent as a brick wall."

After another 385 years we'll be almost ready to pass the asteroid. But
again it will swing around us, this time accelerating out in front of us and
pulling away from Earth.

Cruithne is always going the same direction around the sun. But relative to
Earth it appears to advance and retreat around the circle because of this
faster-and-slower cycle.

Viewed from Earth, this kind of orbit is called a horseshoe. It's so complex
that no one diagram can sum it up: One has to look at several plots from
different viewpoints, each giving a pattern like a spirograph.

The best way to see it is on the discoverer's Web page, which carries
animations of the asteroid's path:
www.astro.queensu.ca/~wiegert/3753/mpegs/rot6.mpg, and also the main
Cruithne page at www.astro.queensu.ca/~wiegert/3753/3753.html.

But do Cruithne and asteroid 2002AA29 matter? Some experts say they don't.

"They're really only of interest to dynamicists," the people who plot the
paths of heavenly bodies and the forces that act on them, says Peter Brown
of the University of Western Ontario's astronomy department.

Neither asteroid is going to hit us, and both differ from other "near-Earth"
asteroids only because their orbits are attuned to ours, a phenomenon that
scientists call resonance. They aren't even especially close to us; both are
tiny little lifeless rocks -- scientists estimate Cruithne is about five
kilometres in diameter -- that are always more distant than our moon, even
at their closest approach. Cruithne, for instance, never comes closer than
15 million kilometres to us.

They are, however, our neighbours, and our partners in an intricate dance
lasting billions of years.

© Copyright 2002 The Ottawa Citizen

============
(2) APOCALYPSE NOT JUST NOW

>From Los Angeles Times, 30 November 2002
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-ed-asteroids30nov30.story  
   
The doomsday scenario of an asteroid wiping out the Earth while humans cower
helplessly in fear has always seemed unsporting -- a kind of ultimate
drive-by shooting from outer space. But in the new issue of the scientific
journal Nature, scientists have, well, exploded the notion that asteroids
capable of causing catastrophic damage hit the Earth as often as had
previously been reckoned. It turns out that the frequency is only about once
every 1,000 years, instead of every 200 to 300 years.

With a new environmental hazard seeming to appear almost each day, it's
almost comforting to know that at least one threat to the Earth has been
downgraded. The researchers drew on formerly secret data held by the
departments of Defense and Energy to conclude that even if an asteroid of
the size that wiped out 700 square miles in Siberia in 1908 were to hit the
Earth every 1,000 years, a city would probably be destroyed only every
30,000 years because the planet is made up mostly of ocean.

Still, it's a game of numbers. These objects, also known as minor planets,
number in the hundreds of thousands. They're the junk of space, the residue
of a planet destroyed in the distant past. Most travel in a belt between the
orbits of Mars and Jupiter. But some adventurous ones have taken a detour
and headed for the Earth -- and a good thing too for us. Scientists see an
asteroid that hit the Yucatan Peninsula 65 million years ago as the cause of
a chilling climate change and the extinction of dinosaurs, and perhaps the
rise of mammals.

Asteroids have given in the past, just as they could take away in the
future. But if Nature is to be believed, for now these identified flying
objects can recede from the worry list.

Copyright 2002, Los Angeles Times

===============
(3) LIFE SAVE FROM SUPERNOVAS?

>From Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>

[Extracted from inScight, Academic Press
http://www.academicpress.com/inscight/11262002/grapha.htm]

Tuesday, 26 November 2002, 5 pm PST

Life Safe from Supernovas?
By ROBERT IRION

Space is full of threats to life, especially asteroids that smack into
Earth. An even more explosive hazard looms in deep space: supernovas, which
can unleash enough radiation to zap our life-shielding ozone layer. However,
a new study, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal,
concludes that a supernova must blow up within 25 light-years of Earth to
wreak major havoc -- so close that it might happen just once or twice in a
billion years.

In 1974, the risk seemed higher. Physicist Malvin Ruderman of Columbia
University in New York City calculated that gamma rays and cosmic rays from
a supernova about 50 light-years away would erase most of our ozone for
decades, exposing Earth's surface to harmful ultraviolet (UV) light
from the sun. Since then, researchers have debated how much radiation
supernovas produce, how those rays damage the atmosphere, and how often
stars explode near our sun. The latter estimates are "all over the map,"
says astrophysicist Neil Gehrels of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in
Greenbelt, Maryland. Some teams have claimed that recent supernovas --
perhaps within the last few million years -- devastated life.

That's unlikely, according to work by Gehrels and his colleagues. The team
used a detailed model of the atmosphere to gauge how nitrogen oxides -- a
chemical species catalyzed by a supernova's radiation -- would destroy
ozone. The researchers also used the energy from Supernova 1987A, which
exploded in another galaxy in 1987, as a guide for how much radiation would
reach
Earth. The results are good news for Earthlings: In order to thin the ozone
layer so that twice as much UV light reaches the surface, a star must
explode within 25 light-years. There are no massive stars -- the ones that
die as supernovas -- that close to the Earth today. Moreover, these stars
approach our solar system so seldom that a nearby supernova should happen
only every 700 million years or so, on average, according to the team's
analysis of stellar motions in the galaxy, making them minor contributors to
the history of mass extinctions on earth.

The study surpasses other attempts to quantify the effects of supernovas on
Earth's atmosphere, says astronomer John Scalo of the University of Texas,
Austin. "Their result depends sensitively on many things, but it's the best
we have right now," he says. Lower-level radiation from more distant
supernovas still might have triggered episodes of genetic mutation hundreds
or thousands of times during Earth's history, Scalo notes.

© 2002 The American Association for the Advancement of Science

=============
(4) SCIENTISTS USE VIDEO IN SEARCH FOR RAE METEORITE

>From NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory <info@jpl.nasa.gov>

http://www.expressnews.ualberta.ca/expressnews/articles/news.cfm?p_ID=3443&s=e

Scientists use video in search for rare meteorite
By Phoebe Dey
University of Alberta, Canada
November 28, 2002

A University of Alberta astronomy camera captured a photograph of a blazing
fireball, which may provide clues to finding a rare meteorite.

"If we could find the remains of the meteorite, it would be quite
significant, not simply because it's another meteorite but because we would
have the potential for determining its trajectory before it struck the
earth," said U of A physics professor, Dr. Doug Hube. "We might be able to
learn where in the solar system it came from."

The camera on the rooftop observatory on the U of A physics building
captured the image moving from the southwest horizon to the northwest for
about seven seconds at 5:10 a.m. early Wednesday morning. Hube and Martin
Connors from Athabasca University are analysing the tape and using
eyewitness reports to do a geometric triangulation, which will determine a
more specific area to find the meteorite.

Videotape from the U of A's cameras is considered the final authority. The
cameras record images of the sky 24 hours a day. About once a year, the
cameras capture something worth following up, Hube said. The camera is
mounted above a hemispherical mirror, which allows researchers to monitor
the entire sky at one time.

If this latest meteorite can be found, it will offer insight to its
celestial beginnings and teach us more about the larger environment we live
in.

"Meteorites are the building blocks of the planets," Hube said. "They can
give us clues about circumstances in this corner of the universe 4.5 billion
years ago. Understanding them gives us a broader picture to understand the
formation of the solar system, to understand the formation of planets."

The University of Alberta's Earth and Atmospheric Sciences department boasts
a meteorite collection second only to the national one in Ottawa. It is
comprised of more than 130 different meteorites--13 of which were found in
Alberta. Only 50 meteorites have been found in Canada.

===========
(5) WESTERN FIREBALL WAS SPACE JUNK, NOT METEOR

>From Associated Press, 29 November 2002
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1038534231870_105///?hub=SciTech

SEATTLE - A ball of fire streaking across the sky of western North America
early Thursday had people throughout the region flooding radio and
television stations with calls reporting a meteor shower.

It turned out the burning light came from a Russian rocket body re-entering
the Earth's atmosphere about 6:15 a.m. PST.

The U.S. Strategic Command in Omaha, Neb., and the North American Aerospace
Defence Command confirmed a Russian rocket fell back to Earth but did not
immediately release further details.

Canadian navy spokesman Gerry Pash said the space junk could be seen across
much of Western Canada and possibly as far inland as Montana.

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration received calls from Portland, Ore.,
to the Canadian border Thursday morning.

Callers assuming it was a meteor shower said the light appeared to move more
slowly than a shooting star but faster than a plane. Witnesses said it had a
long tail, which seemed to break into two pieces.

Copyright 2002, AP

==============
(6) JUPITER-LIKE PLANETS FORMED IN HUNDREDS - NOT MILLIONS - OY YEARS

>From Andrew Yee <ayee@nova.astro.utoronto.ca>

University of Washington
Seattle, Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Nov. 28, 2002

FROM: Vince Stricherz, 206-543-2580, vinces@u.washington.edu

Jupiter-like planets formed in hundreds -- not millions -- of years, study
shows

An accepted assumption in astrophysics holds that it takes more than 1
million years for gas giant planets such as Jupiter and Saturn to form from
the cosmic debris circling a young star. But new research suggests such
planets form in a dramatically shorter period, as little as a few
hundred years.

The forming planets have to be able to survive the effects of nearby stars
burning brightly, heating and dispersing the gases that accumulate around
the giant planets. If the process takes too long, the gases will be
dissipated by the radiation from those stars, said University of
Washington astrophysicist Thomas R. Quinn.

"If a gas giant planet can't form quickly, it probably won't form at all,"
he said.

The standard model of planet formation holds that the spinning disk of
matter, called a protoplanetary disk, that surrounds a young star gradually
congeals into masses that form the cores of planets. That process was
thought to take a million years or so, and then the giants gradually
accumulate their large gaseous envelopes over perhaps another 1 million to
10 million years.

But the new research, culled from a much-refined mathematical model,
suggests that the protoplanetary disk begins to fragment after just a few
spins around its star. As the disk fragments, clusters of matter begin to
form quickly and immediately start to draw in the gases that form vapor
shrouds around gas giants.

"If these planets can't form quickly, then they should be a relatively rare
phenomenon, whereas if they form according to this mechanism they should be
a relatively common phenomenon," said Quinn, a UW research assistant
astronomy professor.

The existence of gas giant planets, it turns out, seems to be fairly common.
Since the mid-1990s, researchers have discovered more than 100 planets,
generally from the mass of Jupiter to 10 times that size, orbiting stars
outside the solar system. Those planets were deduced by their gravitational
effect on their parent stars, and their discovery lends credence to the new
research, Quinn said.

Lucio Mayer, a former UW post-doctoral researcher who recently joined the
University of Zurich, is lead author of a paper detailing the work,
published in the Nov. 29 edition of Science. Besides Quinn, co-authors are
James Wadsley of McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and Joachim
Stadel at the University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Their work
is supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration's Astrobiology Institute.

Since the early 1950s, some scientists have entertained the notion that gas
giant planets were formed quickly. However, the model, using a specialized
fluid dynamics simulation, had never been refined enough to show what it
does now. The Mayer-Quinn team spent the better part of two years refining
calculations and plugging them into the model to show what would happen to a
protoplanetary disk over a longer time.

"The main criticism people had of this model was that it wasn't quite ready
yet," Quinn said. "Nobody was making any predictions out of it, but here we
are making predictions out of it."

The new model explains why two other giant planets in our system, Uranus and
Neptune, don't have gas envelopes like Jupiter and Saturn, Quinn said. At
the time those planets were being formed, the solar system was part of a
star cluster. The outer planets of Uranus and Neptune were too close to a
nearby star -- one that has since migrated away -- and therefore lost
whatever gas envelopes they might have accumulated.

Neither the new model nor the standard model accounts for why most of the
gas giant planets found outside the solar system are much nearer their suns
than are Jupiter and Saturn, Quinn said. The most common belief currently is
that the planets formed farther away from their stars and then migrated
inward to the positions where they have been discovered.

The new model also doesn't account for the formation of terrestrial planets,
like Earth and Mars, near our sun. But Quinn suspects that perhaps the
smaller terrestrial planets were formed over longer periods by processes
described by the standard planet-formation model, while the new model
explains how the larger gas giants came to be.

"That's my bet at the moment," he said.

###

For more information, contact Quinn at (206) 685-9009 or
trq@astro.washington.edu, or Mayer at (011) 41-1-6355740
or lucio@physik.unizh.ch

IMAGE CAPTION:
[ http://www.washington.edu/newsroom/news/images/disk-hr.jpg (23KB)]
A computer simulation shows how a protoplanetary disk surrounding a young
star begins, in a relatively short time, to fragment and form gas giant
planets with stable orbits. (Photo credit: Mayer, Quinn, Wadsley, Stadel)

================
(7) NEW PLANETS CAN FORM IN UNDER 1000 YEARS

>From UPI, 28 November 2002
[ http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20021127-112737-3013r ]

Thursday, November 28, 2002, 2:45 PM EST

New planets can form in under 1,000 years
(Reported by Charles Choi, UPI Science News, in New York)

SEATTLE (UPI) -- Instead of planets taking millions of years to form as
previously thought, researchers said Thursday new calculations suggest they
sometimes can form within a few centuries.

"The first one in our model pops up around 150 years," researcher Thomas
Quinn, an astrophysicist at the University of Washington in Seattle, told
United Press International. "Things can happen quickly."

When it comes to planetary formation, the standard theory says it takes a
million years or more for the solid cores of gas giants such as Jupiter or
Saturn to clump from the cosmic debris that whirls around young stars. After
the cores appear, according to the theory, it takes another 1 million to 10
million years for envelopes of gas to enshroud them.

Recent surveys of some 1,000 stars reveal about 10 percent have gas giants
orbiting them, generally ranging in size from about the mass of Jupiter to
10 times that large. "If they take millions of years to form, then they
probably would be a very rare phenomenon," Quinn said.

The new model from Quinn and colleagues suggests the spinning disks of gas
that orbit stars break apart after only a few spins. Fragments then quickly
begin to coalesce due to gravity. "If this really happens out there, then it
would probably dominate the way planets form," Quinn told UPI.

Although scientists have considered such a scenario for decades, the
calculations involved have been forbidding. But in the Nov. 29 issue of the
journal Science, Quinn and his team reported simulating one million clouds
of gas, each one-thirtieth of an Earth mass, at one-hour intervals as they
interacted gravitationally for up to 350 years.

"We used a fraction of the machine at the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
(at Carnegie-Mellon University) for a solid several weeks. It's roughly like
having 100 of the fastest Pentium computers all running the same
calculations for a couple of weeks," Quinn said.

Refining the calculations took nearly two years, he added. The results
suggest gas giants can grow in fewer than 1,000 years, and accumulate masses
similar to those spotted around other stars.

Planetary scientist Jack Lissauer of NASA Ames Research Center in Moffett
Field, Calif., remains skeptical.

"It's not that I think the calculations are bad. They're the best
calculations on this facet of the problem that have ever been done," he
said. However, Lissauer said, for planets to form this quickly, the disks
from which they emerge need to be very unstable, and before any forming
planet reached that stage slight instabilities would cause spiral waves to
flatten out any clumps.

Also, Quinn said, the computer model does not explain how rocklike planets
such as Earth form, for which the standard model can provide an answer.
Neither model yet can explain why so many planets seen outside our solar
system orbit so close to their stars, he added.

"Do I think this work is an important advance? Yes. Do I think it is
definitive? No," said computational astrophysicist Richard Durisen of
Indiana University in Bloomington. He and Quinn said future calculations
need to take better account of the extremely complex role temperature plays.

"That's actually quite hard," Quinn explained, noting it would require at
least 2-to-10 times more computing power. "Fortunately, computers always get
faster, so that makes it doable in a year's time or whenever," he said.

Copyright © 2002 United Press International. All rights reserved.

============
(8) THE FIRST DECADAL REVIEW OF THE EDGEWORTH-KUIPER BELT: TOWARDS NEW
FRONTIERS

>From Joel Parker <joel@boulder.swri.edu>

                         Announcement
                and Invitation for Participation
                              in

     THE FIRST DECADAL REVIEW OF THE EDGEWORTH-KUIPER BELT
                     TOWARDS NEW FRONTIERS

                          to be held
                     on 11 -- 14 March 2003
                      in Antofagasta/Chile

=========================================================================
       Web page of the Workshop:                       http://tno.ucn.cl
       Early registration deadline:                    2 January 2003
       Paper Title & Abstract Submission deadline:     2 January 2003
             ---------------------------------------------------
 Special excursion and visit of the Very Large Telescope VLT is foreseen
=========================================================================
                          Dear Colleague,

we would like to invite you to participate in our scientific workshop on the
Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt to be held in March 2003 in Chile. The workshop is
organized jointly by the European Southern Observatory and the Universidad
Catolica del Norte in Antofagasta.


Science Program
---------------
The members of the scientific organizing committee

   Antonella Barucci (Observatoire Meudon, France)
   Hermann Boehnhardt (Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy Heidelberg, Germany)
   John Davies (Royal Observatory Edinburgh, Great Britain)
   Dave Jewitt (University Hawaii, USA)
   Olivier Hainaut (European Southern Observatory)
   Scott Kenyon (Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, USA)
   Hal Levison (South-West Research Institute Boulder, USA)
   Dina Prialnik (University Tel Aviv, Israel)
   Alan Stern (South-West Research Institute Boulder, USA)
   Gianni Strazzulla (Osservatorio Catania, Italy).

have defined the following key topics for this workshop

- The dynamical picture of the outer solar system.
- The taxonomic populations. (KBOs, Centaurs, satellites, comets)
- The formation, evolution and links between dynamical and physical aspects.
- The modelling concepts and physical interpretations.
- The impact of laboratory studies.
- Mission targets: Pluto/Charon and the New Horizons mission, cometary missions.
- The observational, modelling and experimental challenges. (methods and key programs)
- The synoptic view of the outer solar system and bodies therein.
- "Edgeworth-Kuiper-Belts" around the Sun and other Stars.


Visit at the Very Large Telescope VLT
-------------------------------------
The workshop will happen in Antofagasta, one of the largest cities in Chile,
located about 1500km North of Santiago, and right in the heart of the
Atacama dessert. About 2 1/2 hours drive South of Antofagasta the Very Large
Telescope is operated by ESO at Cerro Paranal. The workshop participants are
kindly invited in a one-day excursion to this observatory, one of the most
exciting places of observational astronomy in the world.

For the Scientific and Local Organizing Committee

Hermann Boehnhardt

============================
* LETTERS TO THE MODERATOR *
============================

(9) ORBITAL CALCULATIONS

>From Alan Fitzsimmons <a.fitzsimmons@qub.ac.uk>

Dear Benny,

Just a couple of comments regarding Jay Tate's conclusions in yesterdays
CCNET distribution.

First, a rather pedantic one. I believe Jay meant to say that no NEAs had
been discovered by UK-funded programmes in the past 5 years, in which he is
absolutely correct (to my knowledge). However PPARC supported astronomers
have discovered tens, if not hundreds, of asteroids and other minor bodies
during this same period. A bit off-topic, but I thought I'd better stand up
for myself and my fellow observers!

Second, a more serious comment. Jay worries about the fact that no (NEA)
orbits have been calculated by BNSC or PPARC funded astronomers in a similar
period. This may be true, altough I'm not a dynamicist and am not fully
aware of the research taking place in institutes such as Armagh Observatory
and Queen Mary University of London. However, this _is_ done on a 24-hour
basis by 4 world-leading teams - the MPC, JPL, NEODYS and Lowell. The
results of these calculations are made freely available by these teams
shortly after calculation. It is not obvious that a 5th set of orbital
elements would add anything new, or is warrented.

Best Wishes
Alan Fitzsimmons

==================
(10) MARTIAN METEORITE PATROL PICKS ONE UP

>From John Michael Williams <jwill@AstraGate.net>

Hi Benny.

> CCNet 139/2002 - 27 November 2002
> ---------------------------------
> (3) MARTIAN METEORITES MADE EASY
> >From Sky & Telescope, 25 November 2002
> http://skyandtelescope.com/news/current/article_803_1.asp
>
> By J. Kelly Beatty
> ...
> After much number crunching, however, impact
> modelers eventually deduced
> that it could be done - if the impact event were
> powerful enough to leave
> behind a crater at least 10 km across. ...

This is a reckless claim. The SIZE of the impact means nothing in terms of
whether there is time in an impact to accelerate a rock without destroying
it.

The reason no intact rock can be ejected by an impact is because of the
properties of rock, not because of the properties of impacts. From a body
with a lower escape speed (say, the Moon), or for rocks which could conduct
sound at higher speed (say, 8 km/s), intact ejection MIGHT occur,
depending on the calculated effects of the impact.

So far as I know, there is one exception: An impact which destroyed the
target, thus also lowering its gravitational field near the "ejection"
region.  Remove the planet from the rock.

The whole issue of rock and sound speed as a parameter is explained in
http://publish.aps.org/eprint/gateway/eplist/aps1999jun25_002

One would wish that the kind of computation reported were directed toward
more constructive effort, such as epidemiology or antiterrorism, or the
design of missiles which could hit their target.

We read, at the Sky and Telescope link:

> ...
> James N. Head (Raytheon Missile Systems), who performed
> the computer modeling for his doctoral thesis at the University
> of Arizona, also managed to solve another Martian-meteorite
> quandary. Most of these stones crystallized within the last few
> hundred million years, ... The key, as Head and his
> colleagues explain, is that the meteorites must have originally
>  been buried in the layer of regolith, ...

Whence the need for a bigger impact. But, the simpler explanation would be
that the "Martian meteorites" formed in space after ejection in a fluid
state. Or, perhaps, the crystallization date also might be wrong, and the
origin of the "Martian meteorites" might have nothing to do with the modern
planet Mars.
--
                         John
                     jwill@AstraGate.net
                     John Michael Williams

--------------------------------------------------------------------
CCNet is a scholarly electronic network. To subscribe/unsubscribe, please
contact the moderator Benny J Peiser < b.j.peiser@livjm.ac.uk >. Information
circulated on this network is for scholarly and educational use only. The
attached information may not be copied or reproduced for any other purposes
without prior permission of the copyright holders. The fully indexed archive
of the CCNet, from February 1997 on, can be found at
http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/cccmenu.html. DISCLAIMER: The opinions,
beliefs and viewpoints expressed in the articles and texts and in other
CCNet contributions do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and
viewpoints of the moderator of this network.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


*

LIMITS ON THE ORIGINS AND SPACE TRANSPORT OF LIFE*

By Andrew Glikson
Australian National University
Canberra, ACT 0200
andrew.glikson@anu.edu.au

* reprinted from Meteorite, 2002, 8:8-13.

Preface

"Good planets are hard to come by" (anonymous)

In his classic novel, First and Last Man, Olaf Stapledon portrays a future
generation of humans who, when faced with solar evolution into a red giant
and planetary incineration, undertake the dissemination of genetically coded
seeds into outer space. Toward the end of the second millennium - space
exploration, the blurring of boundaries between science and science fiction,
and human degradation of the biosphere, resulted in an emergence of similar
sentiments, expressed by statements such as: "As the most evolved and
capable of life forms, our main responsibility is to promote this inherent
drive of life for propagation and expansion. These are the principles of a
pan-biotic (or bio-cosmic) ethics that may propel us to seed the galaxy"
(Mautner, Meteorite 8 (1) 2002). The history of science is full of examples
of theories closely linked with human aspirations, myths and transient
fashions, as recognized, for example, by Paul Davies: "I want to make the
obvious point that all theories of life contain hidden philosophical
assumptions". Our age is no exception, having degraded the terrestrial
ecosystem, some crave for greener pastures in space. It may be no accident
that, as a corollary to a human-destiny-in-space imperative, theories
in-vogue regarding the origin of life tend to focus on outer planets or
comets. This article reviews aspects of interplanetary and interstellar
panspermia theories. It questions the significance of the effects of
bio-transfer, had such taken place, in relation to the billions of
years-long geological and biological evolution of the complex terrestrial
biosphere.

Building blocks of life

Fundamental questions regarding the origin of life lie somewhere between
science and philosophy. A universal nature of the yet little-understood laws
that underlie synthesis of amino acids into DNA implies that, at least in
principle, life can develop wherever suitable chemical and physical
conditions occur. The operation of life-forming "bio-friendly" laws (see
below) allows estimates on the probability of life in the universe such as
given by Drake's equation (see Meteorite, 2000, 6 (4), p.14). By contrast,
the probability of accidental synthesis of DNA from amino acids faces odds
in the order of 1 to 10120 scale. According to Ockham's Razor parsimony
principle, at the heart of the scientific method, a theory needs to be
justified either by observation and/or by conceptual necessity. Neither
requirement has been demonstrated in connection with the suggestion of
interstellar panspermia.

One version of panspermia focuses on early accretion stages of Earth, when
gravitational collapse of dust particles under temperatures in excess of
about 1000*K was followed by late accretion of volatile and organic
components. Delsemme (see Icarus, 1999, 146, p. 313-325) pointed to the
significance of early cometary contributions to the volatile and organic
inventory of the atmosphere and hydrosphere, from the deuterium level in the
oceans. The  left-hand and right-hand mirror image structural symmetry
(termed "racemic") of amino acid molecules is a promising criterion for
discrimination between terrestrial and extraterrestrial organic components.
Extraterrestrial organic compounds found in carbonaceous chondrites and in
K-T impact boundary deposits at Stevns Klint, Denmark, include amino
isobutayric acid (AIB) and isovaline  which possess right-hand symmetries,
attributed to shock-induced structural effects. By contrast, terrestrial
amino acids mostly possess left-hand symmetry, with exception such as in
some fungi peptides (Zhao and Bada, 1989, Nature, 339, p. 463-464). Had
large-scale introduction and preservation of extra-terrestrial amino acids
possessing right-hand symmetry been common, since these molecules do not
appear to be metabolized by terrestrial micro-organisms they should have
been extensively preserved, which is not the case. This evidence potentially
argues against large-scale introduction of cometary organic molecules into
the atmosphere and hydrosphere. More likely, the bulk of these compounds
were destroyed on entry and meteoritic explosion.

The presence of Si-Al-rich granitic continental-type rocks and of water on
the Earth's surface prior to the Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB: 3.95-3.8 Ga)
in the inner solar system is attested to by the occurrence of up to ~4.4
Ga-old zircons (zirconium silicate) in Gascoyne Province, Western Australia.
Formation of granitic magma involves partial melting processes in the
presence of water. Carbon isotope studies of inclusions of graphite within
apatite from early Archaean banded iron formations in southwestern Greenland
suggest biogenic activity, although uncertainties exist about the age of the
apatite. Oxygen isotope studies of inclusions in the early ~4.4 Ga zircons
provide evidence for low temperature conditions. The existence of solid
crustal domains pre-3.8 Ga would allow the survival of chemotropic bacteria
such as occur in deep crustal faults and fractures, and possibly also of
transient photosynthesising near-surface bacterial colonies - stromatolites.
The latter would have been severely perturbed by the cataclysmic bombardment
about 3.95-3.8 Ga (LHB), which added further accumulation of dust and
volatiles, contributing further to the hydrosphere and atmosphere.

An early existence of a terrestrial hydrosphere requires discrimination
between volatile and organic components introduced from indigenous
terrestrial sources and extraterrestrial contributions. Organic compounds
are continuously synthesized in terrestrial environments, for example in
volcanic hydrothermal systems and submarine fumaroles ("black chimneys").
Comparisons between the volatile fraction of some comets: H-56%; O-31%;
C-10%; N-2.7%; S-0.3%), and volatile fractions of volcanic hydrothermal
fluids - Kilauea, Hawaii, 1918 eruption: H2O - 30%; H2 - 0.35%; CO2 - 40%;
CO - 1.2%; SO2 - 28%; S2 - 0.04%; HCL - 0.034%, indicate occurrence of
similar components, albeit in different proportions and at different
oxidation states.

Laboratory experiments are consistent with the synthesis of organic
molecules in the early terrestrial environment. Assumed starting conditions
vary from reducing atmosphere rich in methane, ammonia, hydrogen and water,
synthesized into amino acids by lightening (the famous Miller-Urey
experiment) to a CO2-dominated atmosphere and interaction between alkaline
fluids and low-pH surface water, resulting in precipitation of colloidal FeS
membranes demonstrated more recently (1997) by Russell and Hall. These
authors write: "The earliest truly replicating cells probably required only
twenty or so elements ... all of them available at submarine hot springs,
and a limited range of fundamental organic molecular components..."

In the book, The Hot Deep Biosphere, Thomas Gold attributes the origin of
the building blocks of life to leakage of methane from the Earth's mantle
and its reduction in deep-seated fractures by thermophilic (heat-seeking)
bacteria which metabolize hydrocarbons. Such micro-organisms are found in
deep wells and include primitive Archaea (nuclei-free) and Bacteria
(nuclei-bearing) super-kingdoms, which are thought to represent relics of a
deep seated habitat that survived early extinctions caused by
extraterrestrial bombardment. It may be that Earth's earliest habitats
consisted of methane-metabolizing thermophiles.
 
Terrestrial biological records suggests that evolution from original
thermophile bacteria to multicellular genera requires geological periods in
the order of 109 years. The evolving biosphere constitutes associations of
multiple inter-dependent organisms, not colonies of single independent
species. According to Kirschvink and Weiss, analyses based on the three
fundamental biological groupings (or superkingdoms) - Bacteria, Archaea, and
Eucarya, suggest that their last common ancestor (LCA) dates back to about
4.0 Ga, in agreement with the possible occurrence of fossil micro-organisms
and magneto-fossils in the 3.9-4.1 Ga ALH84001, and possibly with the
isotopically light carbon in graphite in Greenland.

Inter-planetary and inter-stellar bio-transport

Recent support for inter-planetary transport of micro-organisms within the
solar system arises from considerations of impact dynamics, low-temperature
transport of ejecta, upper survival limits of captured microbial spores, and
possibly evidence from likely Martian ejecta - meteorite ALH84001. According
to Everett Gibson, Martian biogenic signatures in ALH84001 include (a)
magnetite crystals characteristic of magnetotactic bacteria; (b) Reduced
carbon components containing no 14C signatures and therefore of
non-terrestrial origin (c) carbonate formation temperatures of 50oC; (d)
biofilms of polysaccarides from colonies of bacteria which appear not to be
terrestrial, and (e) unique morphological structures which match fossilized
terrestrial bacteria but occur in clays of interpreted Martian origin.
However, recently similar magnetite crystals with distinct crystal forms
(termed truncated hexaoctahedrals) were experimentally produced in the
laboratory under non-biogenic conditions by a group led by D.C. Golden and
D.W. Ming of NASA. The jury is still out on ALH84001.

The wide range of conditions under which terrestrial 'extremophile' and
'thermophile' bacteria exist include sub-freezing temperatures under
Antarctic ice sheets, submarine fumaroles at temperatures near to DNA
breaking point (~150 șC), high pressures at deep crustal fractures (5-6 km),
extreme acid or alkaline conditions and high radiation levels. A study of a
sub-bacterial class - nanobacteria, as small as 20-200 nm (1 nm = 1
billionth meter) located in fractures within sandstones drilled off the
Western Australian coast, is yet in its infancy (Uwins et al., 2000). The
nature of nanobacteria ("nanobes") has been and remains controversial,
although the weight of the evidence appears to be in favor of a biogenic
origin. A biogenic origin is supported for the following reasons:  (1)
nanobes form microcolonies at atmopsheric pressure and 22 șC; (2) they are
very similar to, although smaller than, some fungi; (3) their symmetries are
structurally similar to spores and filaments of membrane-bound structures;
(4) they consist of O, C and N; (5) they contain central cavities; (6) they
have non-crystalline wall structures, and (7) they may contain DNA. Nanobes
are not likely to be amorphous or crystalline inorganic substances because
they yield no reflections by electron diffraction in TEM, their chemical
properties are inconsistent with condensed silica vapor, silicates or
sulfides, nor are they composed of carbonate.

The direct interface between bacteria and minerals, in the presence of
water, is demonstrated by SEM studies. Studies have demonstrated bacterial
degradation of terrestrial minerals from filaments preserved in borings
within spinel and magnetite, where bacterial metabolism may combine ground
water-derived oxygen with ferrous iron. The remarkable resilience of
microbial spores argues for their possible survival in the interiors of
little-shocked ejecta. Inter-planetary bio-transport is supported by
paleomagnetic studies that suggest temperatures in the interior of meteorite
ALH84001 did not exceed 40 șC.

In contrast to inter-planetary bio-exchange, interstellar panspermia remains
a theoretical proposition of diminishingly small probabilities. With the
possible exception of a planetary micro-organism at ALH84001, no
extraterrestrial microbes have been identified in meteorites. Claimed
observations of bacteria in meteorites are notoriously difficult to confirm
due to their common contamination in the weathering zone by ground water and
terrestrial micro-organisms.

The panspermia theory was anticipated the Greek philosopher Anassagora
(500-428 B.C.) (cited by T. Gomperz "Griechische Denker" (Lipsia, 1893) and
Aleksandr Oparin, 1941) and again by Lord Kelvin in 1865. Modern versions of
the theory are promoted by the identification of organic molecules in
carbonaceous chondrites, by spectral studies of inter-planetary dust
particles (IDP), and molecular clouds. Fred Hoyle, the well known British
cosmologist, proposed in the 1960s that Earth was "seeded" by
extraterrestrial molecules - including amino-acids, polyaromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), and even nucleic acids. Experiments showing formation
of complex organic molecules from carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and
ammonia-bearing ices upon ultraviolet irradiation, or formation of cellular
membranes and vesicles from simple organic matter, have been interpreted as
evidence for embryonic formation of cells in cometary environments.

The probabilities of capture of planetary ejecta on the surfaces of
extra-solar system planets are discussed by H.J. Melosh, who estimates about
15 solar-system planetary meteorites fall on Earth each year. A similar
number of fragments (larger than 10 cm) is ejected into outer space at
velocities about 5±3 km/sec. Up to one-third of the ejecta from solar system
planets is lost during encounters with the giant planets Jupiter and Saturn.
Due to high meteoritic velocities (higher than 1 km/sec) and large capture
cross-section, about one planetary fragment ejected from the solar system is
captured by another stellar system every 100 million years. Any microbes
carried by such fragments would have to reach a habitable zone. Modeling
indicates the orbits of captured interstellar meteorites are comet-like, and
for a wide range of assumptions about the location and size of a target
terrestrial planet the probability of impact is only about 10-4. This
translates to only a small chance that life can be transported from one
stellar system to another. It seems that the origin of life on Earth will
have to be sought within the confines of the solar system itself, not abroad
in the galaxy.

The focus of current panspermia theories on comets as possible bacterial
breeding grounds arises from the abundance of volatile components. However,
liquid water, known to be essential for life, may not exist on comets except
during transient solar grazing (near approach to the Sun) when evaporation
of comet ices occurs. Depending on the size and composition of rock
fragments, survival probabilities are reduced by the intensity of cosmic
rays. Proponents of panspermia like Wickramasinghe and Hoyle, suggest that,
for the theory to remain viable, it only requires survival of less than 1 in
1020 transported micro-organisms. This does not reflect survival
probabilities of new inter-stellar arrivals on the actual surface of
planets, nor can their effects on indigenous habitats be estimated at
present. Had interplanetary or interstellar transport of extremophile
bacteria occurred in special circumstances, the consequences may have either
been major, causing genetic chain reactions, or alternatively amounted to
minor perturbations in terms of the long-term evolution of biospheres. The
micro-colonists may have thrived, survived or perished.

Life as an information system

Central to panspermia theories is a view of complex organic molecules as
"pre-biotic" substances, which rarely acknowledges the fundamental
distinction between amino acids and complex replicating nucleic acids like
DNA, RNA, proteins, and enzymes. The term "organic", as applied to
carbon-based molecules, is all-too-commonly mistaken for "live" molecules.
Nor does the incredible resilience of micro-organisms, or their possible
space transport, explain the origin of life as such. Paul Davies states:
"For those like myself whose primary interest is in the origin of life,
panspermia is a distinctly unhelpful theory, because it sidesteps the entire
issue of how and where life ultimately originated.", and "A hundred years
ago, when life was considered to be some sort of magic matter, it was
reasonable to expect that there might be a life principle manifested in
chemical affinities. Today, the living cell is regarded not as magic matter,
but as an information processing system, so it is no surprise that a search
for bio-friendliness in chemistry is unrewarding. If the universe really is
bio-friendly, one might expect to discover that property instead in the
principles that govern the behavior of information. It seems to me plausible
that nature may have harnessed the extraordinary information processing
power of quantum systems to build the first autonomous information
replicators - what we call life."

Contributions of extraterrestrial organic molecules to the terrestrial
inventory of organic matter hardly explain the origin of the biosphere,
defined in the Encyclopedia Britannia as the "zone of life, the total mass
of living organisms". The fundamental question inherent in the origin of
life does not reside in the origin of organic "building blocks" (amino
acids, PAHs, etc.) but in the - to date little understood - laws which
underlie their synthesis into complex information-rich bio-molecules
(peptides, nucleic acids, proteins, enzymes). Bio-molecules are
qualitatively unique, with a probability of forming by chance given by
Davies as 1:10120- a fundamental quantum leap commonly overlooked by
proponents of interstellar panspermia. Recent high pressure experiments
indicate that certain peptide pairs can form from amino acid upon shock
pressures. Whether the earliest bio-molecules formed by synthesis of
components leaked from the mantle, derived from volcanic emanations, and/or
from cometary impact contributions, may not provide the answer for life's
origin.

A product cannot be explained by its building blocks but by the nature and
structure of the information it contains. Thus, the logic of the common
argument by panspermia proponents as if bio-molecules on Earth are explained
by the introduction of amino acids from space, may be compared, for example,
to the logic of an argument as if technology was introduced from space,
citing as evidence the use by some humans of Ni-Fe meteorites smelting
products to build machines! There is more to the origin and evolution of
complex life systems than the raw materials of which their products consist.
The total is greater than the sum of its parts!

Panspermia and the space cult

Long intervals exist between the appearance of Procaryotes, Eucaryotes,
cross-fertilization, and multicellular organisms. Isolated episodic
bio-exchanges, had such occurred, may have had a significant or major effect
on the terrestrial biosphere or, alternatively, constituted no more than
mere blips on the bio-cosmic radar. Corollaries between panspermia theories
and the current cult of space travel and colonization may not be accidental
but follow hidden philosophical assumptions. A hint to the latter is the
fundamental absolutism of destiny-in-space prophecies, which tend to have
more in common with Von Daniken Chariots of the Gods type myths than with
science or humanism. Concepts of planetary and genetic engineering often
betray limited understanding of, and even less reverence toward, the
incredible complexity of a biosphere evolved over more than four billion
years.

The natural willful growth-at-all-cost paradigm, all the way from the DNA to
the GNP, constitutes a deterministic reality not easily reconciled with
concepts of sustainability and survival, nor with human ideals of free will.
Attempts at playing God by a species driven by age-old yearnings for
immortality and omnipotence, fed by an overgrown neo-cortex, are belied by
the poor credentials of predatory Homo Sapiens as a planetary gardener, nor
does the record of the species bode well for the future of colonized
planetary realms. The fast dwindling resources of the pillaged biosphere are
needed for irrigation of deserts and marine farming of oceans, rather than
for space havens for a privileged few escaping a planet in peril. In the
words of Carl Sagan, our allegiance is to the Earth from which we spring:

"For we are the local embodiment of a Cosmos grown to self-awareness. We
have begun to contemplate our origins: starstuff pondering the stars;
organized assemblages of ten billion billion billion atoms considering the
evolution of atoms; tracing the long journey by which, here at least,
consciousness arose. Our loyalties are to the species and the planet. WE
speak for the Earth. Our obligation to survive is owed not just to ourselves
but also to that Cosmos, ancient and vast, from which we spring."

References

Davies, P., 1998. The Fifth Miracle. Penguin Books.
Dyson, F., 1985. Origins of Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gold, T. 1999. The Deep Hot Biosphere. xiv+235 pp. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Hoyle, F. and Wichramasinghe, N.C., 1980. Comets and the Origin of Life (C.
Ponnaperuma, Ed.), Reidel, Dordrecht, 227 pp.
Sagan, C. and Shklovskii, I.S., 1966. Intelligent Life in the Universe.
Picador, London.
Schopf, J.W., 1999. Cradle of Life: The Discovery of Earth's Earliest
Fossils. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Uwins, P.J.R., Taylor, A.P., Webb, R.I., 2000. Nanobacteria, fiction or
fact? In: Glikson, M. and Mastalerz,M. (eds), Organic Matter and
Mineralisation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

Copyright 2002, Andrew Glikson



CCCMENU CCC for 2002

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.