CCNet-ESSAY, 16 February 2000


By Michael Paine

Special to  posted: 06:23 am EST  11 February 2000   

First, the good news: Asteroid Eros is not on a collision course with
the Earth.

At roughly twice the size of Manhattan Island, Eros is huge compared
with other known near Earth asteroids. A collision by an object this
size would be more devastating than the impact that is thought to have
finished off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.

Eros in the news because, on Monday, after a torturous four year
journey, the NEAR spacecraft will attempt to become an artificial moon
of Eros. A successful NEAR mission to Eros will show that we have the
ability to rendezvous with an asteroid and to orbit it.

This ability is crucial if -- some scientists would say "when" -- an
asteroid is discovered to be on a collision course with the Earth.

Space missions to asteroids and comets might not seem as exciting as a
landing on Mars but the social,scientific and commercial benefits from
these missions could be great. An asteroid or comet impact with the
Earth is the only type of natural disaster that could instantly wipe out
human civilization and yet, unlike earthquakes, floods and volcanoes, it
is within our grasp to prevent the collision.

The know-how needed to protect the Earth from collision could also be
used for commercial mining in space. Comets and asteroids are packed
with useful raw materials. Eventually space prospectors might want to
rendezvous with them and, perhaps, change their orbit.

Catching Comets; Angling Asteroids

To learn more about the physical properties of asteroids we first have
to reach them with spacecraft.

The NEAR mission is the first attempt to rendezvous with an asteroid. A
rendezvous involves carefully maneuvering the spacecraft so that it
follows nearly the same orbital path as the asteroid. The spacecraft
slowly approaches the object then adjusts its speed so that the
spacecraft and asteroid follow the same path around the Sun. In the case
of NEAR a further maneuver will put the spacecraft into orbit around the

Previous spacecraft missions to asteroids and comets have involved quick
flybys  with no attempt to match speed with the object. These missions
were important    steps in our exploration of these objects but improved
technology was needed to achieve a rendezvous.

One recent space mission was designed to test new technology. In July
last year the Deep Space 1 spacecraft passed within 10 miles (16
kilometers) of asteroid Braille. This mission successfully tested two
important technologies - auto-navigation and the ion drive.
Auto-navigation means that the robot spacecraft worked out its own
location in space and the course to the target object.

The ion drive (pictured below) is an advanced form of propulsion where
the particles coming out of the exhaust are electrically charged (ions)
and they are accelerated by electrical means to very high speeds. Solar
cells or a nuclear generator could provide electrical power.

Deep Space 1 used an advanced solar collector to generate a stunning
2500 watts of power. By using a steady, reliable power source the ion
drive can gradually accelerate the spacecraft to interplanetary speeds.
Within twelve months Deep Space 1 will have consumed all of its 180
pounds (80 kg) of Xenon propellant and reached a speed of 9000 mph (4
per second).

Dr Marc Rayman from the Deep Space 1 mission team explained that the
Braille flyby was a bonus for the primary mission that was mainly
designed to test new technology. The experience gained at Braille will
help them plan an encounter with Comet Borrelly - the main target of the
extended mission. He added that the failure, last November, of the
spacecraft's "star tracker" navigation aid meant that they had dropped
plans to reach a second comet but otherwise the failure would not
seriously hamper the extended mission.

Sling-shots from planets

Many recent interplanetary space missions have involved a gravity-assist
flyby of the Earth. This sling-shot technique can produce substantial
reductions in the size of rocket needed to reach a planet or asteroid.
For example, in January 1998 the NEAR spacecraft whizzed within 340
miles (550 km) of the surface of the Earth. This planned encounter
changed the course of the spacecraft so that it reached Eros one year
later (unfortunately a technical bug prevented the spacecraft from going
into orbit and the mission scientists had to wait a year for the next

Of course, an Earth flyby would be very difficult to sell to the world's
population if the spacecraft was carrying nuclear weapons intended to
deflect an asteroid. Adding further to the difficulties, the best time
to nudge an asteroid is when it is closest to the Sun and this can make
the mission much more challenging.

Alan Harris, Senior Research Scientist with JPL in California points
out a mission to rendezvous with asteroid 1999 AN10 -- in an orbit
which is typical of a "potentially hazardous asteroid" -- would involve
a space mission which is formidable with current rocket technology.
They run out of fuel well before the necessary speeds are achieved.

Maybe we should be dusting off the blueprints for the giant Saturn 5
rockets that were used for the Apollo Moon landings - just in case we
need to quickly intercept an asteroid or comet on a collision course
with the Earth. This may not be that easy - in his book "Mining the
Sky", planetary scientist John Lewis reports that he went looking for
the Saturn 5 blueprints a few years ago and concluded, incredibly, they
had been "lost".

Harris cautions that even the mighty Saturn 5 could only deliver a few
pounds/kilograms of payload to land on, or orbit, an asteroid such as
1999 AN10. He adds "Ion drive is probably the most feasible way out of
this quandary."

To Nuke or To Nudge

An asteroid is heading for Earth. With just days to go before the
collision a beefed-up space shuttle is sent to intercept it. A brave
team of astronauts and  oil-rig workers drills deep into the space
rock, plants a nuclear bomb and blows it in two. The two halves fly
apart and miss the Earth.

Dream on!

The idea of blowing up an asteroid makes for good movie scripts, but is
not the way to do it in the real universe. Many of the fragments would
remain on a collision course and like the blast from a shotgun; the
fragments can do up to ten times as much damage as the original, intact

In any case, Erik Asphaug from the University of Southern California has
modeled "rubble-pile" asteroids and finds that blowing them up with
bombs may be much more difficult than with asteroids made of solid
rock. It is a bit like the difference between hitting a sandbag and a
solid sandstone block with a sledgehammer -- the sandbag absorbs the
impact with little disruption but the sandstone block shatters.

"Stand-off" nuclear explosions are favored by some scientists (see
animation) and might work with both solid and rubble-pile objects.

A nuclear bomb is detonated several hundred yards away from the object.
Surprisingly, it is the intense radiation generated by the explosion
that does the job. In one scenario, the radiation grills one half of the
asteroid and causes a very thin surface layer to vaporize and fly off
into space.

Tens of tons of material blasting off the asteroid at high speed would
be sufficient to jolt the asteroid in the opposite direction. The effect
is like the recoil of a rifle -- a small bullet moving at high speed
causes the heavier rifle to recoil at low speed.

One thing most scientists agree on is there is no need to maintain an
arsenal of nuclear weapons in space ready to intercept rogue asteroids.
They also point out that there are ways to deflect asteroids that don't
require nuclear explosions and we should be looking at these methods
more closely.


In theory, an asteroid that is found to be on a collision course with
our planet can be deflected to avoid an impact.

The deflection involves changing the asteroid's course with a sideways
push or, preferably, changing its orbital speed so that it arrives
before or after, rather than when Earth crosses its path. In either
case the deflection is far more effective if it can be carried out
years or decades ahead of the predicted collision.

For example, after twenty years, a nudge of just 1 m.p.h. (1.6
kilometers per hour) would change an asteroid's location in space by
about 170,000 miles (273,500 kilometers). That is more than halfway to
the moon.

Recent discoveries suggest that deflection of some Earth-threatening
asteroids may be easier than first thought. Most schemes for nudging
asteroids into a safer orbit assumed a single catastrophic encounter
with Earth. This meant changing the course of the object by at least
4,000 miles (6,300 kilometers) -- the radius of Earth.

Alan Harris, from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, explains that
scientists now realize an asteroid will usually make several close
passes by the Earth before a collision occurs.

The recently discovered 1000-yard (1-kilometer) wide asteroid designated
1999 AN 10 provides an instructive example. It will make a close pass of
Earth every few decades. During each pass the asteroid is deflected
slightly by the Earth's gravity.

Astronomers in Italy have calculated that a critical deflection could
occur in 2027. This would involve the asteroid passing through an
imaginary hoop in space they call a "keyhole". If the asteroid were to
pass through this keyhole, which is only about 60 miles (100 kilometers)
across, then it would collide with the Earth on its return in 2039.

When the initial calculations were made, astronomers didn't know the
orbit well enough to determine if it might pass through the keyhole.
After important follow-up observations were made they have now pinned
down the orbit enough to be sure that it will not pass through any
keyhole in 2027 and there is no chance that it will collide with Earth
in the next century or so.

If, however, they had determined instead that there was a chance it
would pass through a keyhole in 2027, then a mission to place a
transponder, like a radio homing device, on the asteroid would have been
wise so that its orbit could be determined precisely.

Harris explains that such a high level of precision would likely be
required to determine for sure if the asteroid were on a course through
a keyhole and, if it came to be, to measure the success of any
deflection efforts. In this case a deflection of just a few hundred
miles prior to the 2027 keyhole event would be all that was needed to
avoid the 2039 collision.

Deflection of dangerous asteroids that are not in a "keyhole" orbit is
more difficult because a larger change in course is required. The task
is still feasible provided that sufficient warning time is given.

If a serious global effort is made to discover most large near-Earth
asteroids within the next decade, then we should have decades, or even
centuries of warning before a devastating impact. With such lead times
only a relatively small nudge is required to change an asteroid's course
so that, decades later, it will miss Earth.

Sailing with Sunlight: Non-nuclear Asteroid Deflection

Asteroid expert Jay Melosh from the University of Arizona has looked at
a range of ideas for deflecting asteroids without resorting to nuclear
weapons. They include:

Deploying a giant parabolic mirror to concentrate the Sun's rays and
vaporize rock on the surface of the asteroid. The vaporized material
flies off at high speed and generates a recoil action that pushes the
asteroid, slowly but surely, in the opposite direction.

Landing cannon-like devices on the surface to fire asteroid material
into space. This also depends on recoil action. An ion drive, as used on
the Deep Space 1 spacecraft, might do the trick.

Attaching a giant solar sail to the asteroid

The solar sail uses the small pressure of sunlight acting over a large
area to steadily move the asteroid.

Melosh points out that the sail needs to be steerable, like the sails of
a modern yacht, to tug the asteroid in the right direction: "An
along-orbit push (at right angles to the Sun) is by far the most
effective in changing a collision into a miss," Melosh says.

There are two other ideas related to the solar sail concept: a giant
silvery balloon(which in theory would be easier to deploy than a sail)
and wrapping the asteroid in foil (or painting it) to increase its
reflectivity. Melosh explains "with such a reflector it is hard to steer
-- it can only apply a force directly away from the Sun, which is the
least helpful direction".

Melosh is cautious about techniques that depend on being attached to the
asteroid. "The asteroid is rotating and perhaps tumbling -- a hard
object to tie anything up to," he says. "It would probably have to be
enclosed by a system of gimbals anchored to the asteroid surface: a
mechanical nightmare begging for a catastrophe."

The solar mirror scheme, preferred by Melosh, has the advantage that it
could avoid the need for physical attachment to the asteroid. During the
1960s NASA did some work on solar mirrors for use in space, but little
has been done since then.

Space Missions: Chasing Comets and Asteroids

Several researchers are using super-computers to predict the effects of
asteroid deflection techniques. One day these simulations may be needed
to plan a mission to save the Earth from a collision.

But the physical properties of asteroids and comets are poorly
understood, and so the information gathered from space missions to these
objects is crucial for these simulations.

Several challenging missions to asteroids and comets are underway or are

(List of Space Missions to Asteroids and Comets)

Although knowledge about asteroids is important for protecting the Earth
from collisions it is more likely to be used, ultimately, for commercial

Over the next few decades an impact by a large asteroid is highly
unlikely (but cannot be ruled out). During that time commercial mining
of asteroids may be commonplace.

Many asteroids are rich in the raw materials needed for manufacturing in
space, and some are easier to reach than the Moon. Of course, one way to
deal with an earth-threatening object is to mine it away to nothing.


CCNet-ESSAY is part of the Cambridge Conference Network. It includes
interesting and thought-provoking essays about our place in space and
the prospects of a planetary civilisation that is in control of our
terrestrial and extraterrestrial environment. Contributions to this
ongoing debate are welcome. To subscribe or unsubscribe from CCNet,
please contact Benny J Peiser at <>. The fully
indexed archive of the CCNet, from February 1997 on, can be found at

CCCMENU CCC for 2000

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.