PLEASE NOTE:


*

CCNet-ESSAY, 22 March 2000
--------------------------

THE 3.2+/- 0.1 B.Y. IMPACT CATACLYSM IN THE EARTH-MOON SYSTEM

By Andrew Glikson <andrew.glikson@anu.edu.au>

Research School of Earth Science,
Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200;


The Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB) in the Earth-Moon system, broadly
defined at 4.2-3.8 * 10^9 years [1], may represent the tail-end of
planetary accretion or, alternatively, include a distinct
3.95-3.80*10^9 years bombardment episode [2]. Here I point out that
combined evidence from terrestrial Archaean terrains and from the
Moon militate for a major impact cataclysm in the Earth-Moon system
about 3.2+/-0.1*10^9 years. Older less-well-defined impact events in
the Earth-Moon system are also marked about 3.47-3.46*10^9 years - a
time of maximum greenstone-granite formation. The question is whether
these events signify an extension of the LHB or represent temporally
distinct episodes.

Some of the largest lunar maria basins contain low-Ti basalts which
likely represent impact-triggered volcanic activity, including Mare
Imbrium (3.86+/-0.02*10^9 year) and associated KREEP-basalts (K, REE,
and P-rich) (3.85+/-0.03*10^9 year) (Apollo 15) [3,4]. Similar
genetic impact-volcanic relationships may pertain in Oceanus
Procellarum (Apollo 12) (low-Ti basalts - Rb-Sr and Ar-Ar ages -
3.29-3.08*10^9 year) and in Hadley Apennines (Apollo 15) (low-Ti
basalts - Rb-Sr ages - 3.37-3.21*10^9 year; Ar-Ar ages -
3.35-3.10*10^9 year) [1]. The likelihood of impact-volcanic
relationships on the Moon gains support from the recent laser
40Ar/39Ar analyses of lunar impact spherules from sample 11199 (Fra
Mauro Formation - Apollo 14) by Muller [5] and Culler et al. [6] -
showing a significant age spike at 3.18*10^9 year, ie. near the
boundary between the Late Imbrian lunar era (3.9-3.2*10^9 year) and
the post-mare Eratosthenian lunar era (3.2-1.2*10^9 year) as defined
by the cratering record [7]. Some 34 lunar impact spherules yield a
mean age of 3188+/-198 Ma and a median age at 3181 Ma, whereas 7
lunar spherule ages with 1* < 100 m.y. yield a mean age of
3178+/-80*10^6 years and a median at 3186*10^6 years.

Since 1986 Don Lowe and Gary Byerly [8-12] perceptively recognised
several impact fallout spherule horizons in the Barberton Mountain
Land, Transvaal. These are defined by U-Pb zircon age determinations
of underlying and overlying pyroclastic volcanic units as: S1 -
3474-3445*10^6 years; S2 - 32434*10^6 years; S3, S4 -
3243-32274*10^6 years. They also detected a 3465-3458*10^6 years
spherule units in the Warrawoona Group, Pilbara Craton, Western
Australia [8]. The extraterrestrial impact origin has been questioned
on textural basis [13] and the PGE-rich composition of the spherules
[10,11] was interpreted as due to secondary processes [14], with
ensuing literature discussion [15,16]. However, these spherule
horizons are now established as undoubted impact condensate fallout
deposits, on the following basis:

(1) Occurrence within the spherules of quench-textured and octahedral
Ni-chromites with extreme values of Ni (NiO<23%), Co, Zn and V,
unknown in terrestrial chromites [12,17], and which contain PGE
nano-nuggets compositionally distinct from terrestrial PGE  nuggets
[17]; (2) 53Cr/52Cr isotopic indices (* = -0.32) corresponding to
values of carbonaceous chondrites and values of K-T boundary impact
fallout deposits, but distinct from terrestrial values [18]; (3) PGE
chondrite-normalised patterns displaying marked depletion in the
volatile species (Pd, Au) relative to refractory species (Ir, Pt),
distinct from terrestrial PGE profiles, excepting depleted mantle
harzburgites; (4) diagnostic textural features, including
inward-radiating quench textures and offset central vesicles, as
defined by B.M. Simonson [19,20].

Mass balance calculations based on Ir and Cr levels and
thermodynamic-based correlations of spherule sizes of 1-4 mm-diameter
[12,18], suggest impact by asteroids on the order of 30-50
km-diameter, scaled to 400-800 km-diameter terrestrial impact basins.
The Fe-Mg-rich spherule composition and the absence of shocked quartz
in the units suggest the impact basins formed in simatic/oceanic
regions of the Archaean Earth, which from geochemical and isotopic
evidence [21] occupied over 90 percent of the Earth surface before
about 3.0*10^9 years. The occurrence of the Barberton S2-S4 spherule
units immediately above the top of a >12 km thick mafic-ultramafic
volcanic sequence (Onverwacht Group) and at the base of a partly
granite-shed clastic sedimentary sequence (Fig Tree Group), hints at
the onset of fundamentally different tectonic/magmatic regimes about
c.3.24-3.227*10^9 years [10].  An analogous break is observed in the
Pilbara craton along the boundary between a 3.24*10^9 years volcanic
sequence (Strelley Group) and an unconformably overlying clastic
(partly granite-shed) -banded ironstone sequence (Gorge Creek Group).
A search for impact spherules within these units is in progress.
Estimates of impact incidence rates and crater/size frequency
distribution, and modelling of the tectonic and magmatic consequences
of mega-impacts on thin thermally active oceanic crust [22,23],
suggest these processes were of fundamental importance during
Archaean crustal evolution. 

It is suggested that the period 3.2+/-0.1*10^9 years represents a
major cataclysm in the Earth-Moon system, resulting in extensive
volcanic activity in lunar maria basins, with a possibility that some
of the largest craters formed at that time. On Earth the bombardment
resulted in formation of terrestrial maria on a scale of several
hundred km-diameter, major volcanic activity, strong vertical
movements, and formation of faulted trough/rift structures
accumulating clastic sediments from uplifted terrains [22, 23].


[1] Basaltic Volcanism of the Terrestrial Planets, Pergamon, New
    York, 1981.
[2] G. Ryder, 1991. Lunar Planet. Instit. Contrib. 746, 42-43.
[3] G. Ryder, 1997. Lunar Planet. Instit. Contrib. 790, 60-61.
[4] G. Ryder, D. Dalrymple, 1997. Lunar Planet. Instit. Contrib. 790,
    62-63.
[5] R.A. Muller, 1993. Tech. Report LBL-34168, Lawrence Berkeley
    National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
[7] T.S. Culler, T.A. Becker, R.A. Muller, P.R. Renne, 2000. 
    Science, 287, 1785-1789.
[8] D.E. Wilhelms, 1987. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1348.
[9] D.R.. Lowe, G.R. Byerly, 1986.  Geology, 14, 83-86.
[10] D.R. Lowe, G.R. Byerly, F. Asaro, F.T. Kyte, 1989.  Science,
     245, 959-962.
[11] F.T. Kyte, L. Zhou, D.R. Lowe, 1992.  Geochim. et Cosmochim.
     Acta, 56, 1365-1372.
[12] G.R. Byerly, D.R. Lowe, 1994.  Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 58,
     3469-3486.
[13] R. Buick, 1987. Geology, 15, 178-179.
[14] C. Koeberl, W.U. Reimold, R.H. Boer, 1993.  Earth Planet. Sci.
     Lett., 119, 441-452.
[15] A.Y. Glikson, 1994, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 126, 497-499.
[16] C. Koeberl, W.U.Reimold, 1993. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 126,
     500-504.
[17] W. Taylor, A.Y. Glikson, G.R. Byerly, in preparation.
[18] A. Shukolayukov, A., F.T. Kyte, G.W. Lugmair, D.R. Lowe, 1998. 
     Abstract, Cambridge meeting on Impacts and the Early Earth.
[19] B.M. Simonson, 1992. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 104, 829–839.
[20] B.M. Simonson, S.W. Hassler, 1997.  Aust. J. Earth Sci., 44,
     37-48.
[21] M.T. McCulloch, V. Bennett, 1996.  Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta,
     58, 4717-4738.
[22] A.Y. Glikson, 1996. Aust. Geol. Surv. Org. J. Aust Geol.
     Geohys., 16/4, 587-608.
[23] A.Y. Glikson, 1999. Geology, 27, 387-341.

Copyright 2000, Andrew Glikson

-----------------
CCNet-ESSAY is part of the Cambridge Conference Network. It includes
interesting and thought-provoking essays about our place in space and
the prospects of a planetary civilisation that is in control of our
terrestrial and extraterrestrial environment. Contributions to this
ongoing debate are welcome. To subscribe or unsubscribe from CCNet,
please contact Benny J Peiser at <b.j.peiser@livjm.ac.uk>. The fully
indexed archive of the CCNet, from February 1997 on, can be found at
http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/cccmenu.html



CCCMENU CCC for 2000

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.